Literature DB >> 15895589

Radiological properties of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters.

A J Venning1, K N Nitschke, P J Keall, C Baldock.   

Abstract

The radiological properties of the normoxic polymer gel dosimeters MAGIC, MAGAS, and MAGAT [methacrylic and ascorbic acid in gelatin initiated by copper; methacrylic acid gelatine gel with ascorbic acid; and methacrylic acid gelatine and tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride, respectively] have been investigated. The radiological water equivalence was determined by comparing the polymer gel macroscopic photon and electron interaction cross sections over the energy range from 10 keV to 20 MeV and by Monte Carlo modeling of depth doses. Normoxic polymer gel dosimeters have a high gelatine and monomer concentration and therefore mass density (kg m(-3)) up to 3.8% higher than water. This results in differences between the cross-section ratios of the normoxic polymer gels and water of up to 3% for the attenuation, energy absorption, and collision stopping power coefficient ratios through the Compton dominant energy range. The mass cross-section ratios were within 2% of water except for the mass attenuation and energy absorption coefficients ratios, which showed differences with water of up to 6% for energies less than 100 keV. Monte Carlo modeling was undertaken for the polymer gel dosimeters to model the electron and photon transport resulting from a 6 MV photon beam. The absolute percentage differences between gel and water were within 1% and the relative percentage differences were within 3.5%. The results show that the MAGAT gel formulation is the most radiological water equivalent of the normoxic polymer gel dosimeters investigated due to its lower mass density measurement compared with MAGAS and MAGIC gels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895589     DOI: 10.1118/1.1881812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Niu; Warren D Foltz; Michael Velec; Joanne L Moseley; Adil Al-Mayah; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A study of effective atomic number and electron density of gel dosimeters and human tissues for scattering of gamma rays: momentum transfer, energy and scattering angle dependence.

Authors:  Murat Kurudirek
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Polymer gel dosimetry.

Authors:  C Baldock; Y De Deene; S Doran; G Ibbott; A Jirasek; M Lepage; K B McAuley; M Oldham; L J Schreiner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Cancer radiotherapy based on femtosecond IR laser-beam filamentation yielding ultra-high dose rates and zero entrance dose.

Authors:  Ridthee Meesat; Hakim Belmouaddine; Jean-François Allard; Catherine Tanguay-Renaud; Rosalie Lemay; Tiberius Brastaviceanu; Luc Tremblay; Benoit Paquette; J Richard Wagner; Jean-Paul Jay-Gerin; Martin Lepage; Michael A Huels; Daniel Houde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Three-dimensional radiation dosimetry using polymer gel and solid radiochromic polymer: From basics to clinical applications.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Leighton Warmington; N Gopishankar
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28

6.  Dosimetry and Radioenhancement Comparison of Gold Nanoparticles in Kilovoltage and Megavoltage Radiotherapy using MAGAT Polymer Gel Dosimeter.

Authors:  S Farahani; N Riyahi Alam; S Haghgoo; M Khoobi; Gh Geraily; E Gorji
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 7.  Radiation Dosimetry by Use of Radiosensitive Hydrogels and Polymers: Mechanisms, State-of-the-Art and Perspective from 3D to 4D.

Authors:  Yves De Deene
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-09-19

8.  Comparison of an anthropomorphic PRESAGE® dosimeter and radiochromic film with a commercial radiation treatment planning system for breast IMRT: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Khalid Iqbal; Kent A Gifford; Geoffrey Ibbott; Ryan L Grant; Saeed Buzdar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Different Dosimeters/Detectors Used in Small-Field Dosimetry: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Wrya Parwaie; Soheila Refahi; Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani; Bagher Farhood
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.