Literature DB >> 15895341

Visual disability variables. I: the importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients.

Robert W Massof1, Cynthia T Hsu, Frank H Baker, G David Barnett, William L Park, James T Deremeik, Carol Rainey, Cathy Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the validity and reliability of latent trait measures estimated from ratings by low-vision patients of the importance and difficulty of selected activity goals.
DESIGN: Validation of a telephone-administered functional assessment instrument using Rasch analysis of self-assessment ratings.
SETTING: Telephone interviews of respondents in their homes. Participants Consecutive series of 600 outpatients with low vision.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratings of the importance and difficulty of achieving 41 activity goals. Person and item traits were measured with the Andrich rating scale model. Measurement validity and reliability were tested statistically by comparing response patterns and distributions with measurement model expectations.
RESULTS: Patients could distinguish only 3 categories of importance and 4 categories of difficulty. The distributions of person and item measure fit statistics were consistent with 2 unidimensional constructs: value of independence estimated from importance ratings and visual ability estimated from difficulty ratings. However, 8 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of value of independence and 7 of 41 activity goals were poor estimators of visual ability. Person measure distributions could be divided into 3 statistically distinct strata for estimates from both importance ratings and difficulty ratings. Item measure distributions could be divided into 21 strata for estimates from importance ratings and 7 strata for estimates from difficulty ratings.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2 variables that define visual disability-value of independence and visual ability-are valid constructs that can be estimated accurately and reliably from patient ratings of the importance and difficulty of activity goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895341     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  19 in total

1.  Improving function in age-related macular degeneration: design and methods of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Barry W Rovner; Robin J Casten; Mark T Hegel; Robert W Massof; Benjamin E Leiby; William S Tasman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  The Vision-Specific Optimization in Primary and Secondary Control (OPS) Scale.

Authors:  Mark Brennan-Ing; Kathrin Boerner; Amy Horowitz; Joann Reinhardt
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2013-12-01

3.  Reliability and validity of the valued activity inventory for adults with cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Mark T Hegel; Jay G Hull; Zhongze Li; Stefan Balan; Stephen Bartels
Journal:  OTJR (Thorofare N J)       Date:  2011-06-30

4.  Baseline traits of low vision patients served by private outpatient clinical centers in the United States.

Authors:  Judith E Goldstein; Robert W Massof; James T Deremeik; Sonya Braudway; Mary Lou Jackson; K Bradley Kehler; Susan A Primo; Janet S Sunness
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08

5.  Equating Visual Function Scales to Facilitate Reporting of Medicare Functional G-Code Severity/Complexity Modifiers for Low-Vision Patients.

Authors:  Tiffany L Chan; Monica S Perlmutter; Melva Andrews; Janet S Sunness; Judith E Goldstein; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study.

Authors:  Janna E Bruijning; Ruth M A van Nispen; Ger H M B van Rens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults.

Authors:  Ruth Ma van Nispen; Gianni Virgili; Mirke Hoeben; Maaike Langelaan; Jeroen Klevering; Jan Ee Keunen; Ger Hmb van Rens
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 8.  Patient-centred measurement in ophthalmology--a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Longitudinal observation, evaluation and interpretation of coping with mental (emotional) health in low vision rehabilitation using the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory.

Authors:  Janna E Bruijning; Ger van Rens; Mark Fick; Dirk L Knol; Ruth van Nispen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Calibration of the Activity Inventory Item Bank: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Instrument for Low Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Micaela Gobeille; Chris Bradley; Judith E Goldstein; Robert Massof
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.