Literature DB >> 1589412

A surface energy analysis of mucoadhesion: contact angle measurements on polycarbophil and pig intestinal mucosa in physiologically relevant fluids.

C M Lehr1, J A Bouwstra, H E Boddé, H E Junginger.   

Abstract

The possible role of surface energy thermodynamics in mucoadhesion was investigated with Polycarbophil and pig intestinal mucosa. In separate experiments, the surface energy parameters of the substrate (mucosa) and the adhesive (polymer film) were determined by contact angle measurements on captive air/octane bubbles in three physiologically relevant test fluids (isotonic saline, artificial gastric fluid, and artificial intestinal fluid). Whereas the swollen Polycarbophil films were relatively hydrophilic as indicated by small water contact angles (22, 23, and 16 degrees), the water contact angles measured on mucosal tissue were significantly larger (61, 48, and 57 degrees). Hence, mucus was found to possess an appreciable hydrophobicity. The measured adhesive performance (force of detachment) between Polycarbophil and pig small intestinal mucosa was highest in nonbuffered saline medium, intermediate in gastric fluid, and minimal in intestinal fluid. In agreement with this trend, the mismatch in surface polarities between substrate and adhesive, calculated from the contact angle data, increased in the same order.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1589412     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018931811189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  7 in total

1.  Wettability of hydrogels. I. Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate).

Authors:  F J Holly; M F Refojo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1975-05

2.  Wettability of polymers by mucin aqueous solutions.

Authors:  A Baszkin; J E Proust; P Monsenego; M M Boissonnade
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Measurement of the surface hydrophobicity of human gastrointestinal mucosa.

Authors:  R T Spychal; J M Marrero; S H Saverymuttu; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Adhesion: mechanisms that assist or impede it.

Authors:  R E Baier; E G Shafrin; W A Zisman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery.

Authors:  J D Smart; I W Kellaway; H E Worthington
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.765

6.  Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion.

Authors:  H J Busscher; A H Weerkamp; H C van der Mei; A W van Pelt; H P de Jong; J Arends
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Gastric mucosal barrier: hydrophobic lining to the lumen of the stomach.

Authors:  B A Hills; B D Butler; L M Lichtenberger
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-05
  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Model-based interpretation of creep profiles for the assessment of polymer-mucin interaction.

Authors:  S Rossi; M C Bonferoni; C Caramella; L Ironi; S Tentoni
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Investigation of wetting behavior of nonaqueous ethylcellulose gel matrices using dynamic contact angle.

Authors:  L W Chan; K T Chow; P W S Heng
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Recent advances in intravesical drug/gene delivery.

Authors:  Pradeep Tyagi; Pao-Chu Wu; Michael Chancellor; Naoki Yoshimura; Leaf Huang
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  In vitro and in vivo characteristics of a thermogelling rectal delivery system of etodolac.

Authors:  Nahla S Barakat
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Surface energy of microcrystalline cellulose determined by capillary intrusion and inverse gas chromatography.

Authors:  D Fraser Steele; R Christian Moreton; John N Staniforth; Paul M Young; Michael J Tobyn; Stephen Edge
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Modelling mucoadhesion by use of surface energy terms obtained from the Lewis acid-Lewis base approach. II. Studies on anionic, cationic, and unionisable polymers.

Authors:  M Rillosi; G Buckton
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Evaluation of poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles for mucoadhesive ocular drug delivery. I. Effect of formulation variables on physicochemical characteristics of nanoparticles.

Authors:  S K Das; I G Tucker; D J Hill; N Ganguly
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Molecular aspects of mucoadhesive carrier development for drug delivery and improved absorption.

Authors:  Nicholas A Peppas; J Brock Thomas; James McGinty
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 9.  Engineering design and molecular dynamics of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems as targeting agents.

Authors:  Laura Serra; Josep Doménech; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.571

10.  Bioadhesion by means of specific binding of tomato lectin.

Authors:  C M Lehr; J A Bouwstra; W Kok; A B Noach; A G de Boer; H E Junginger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.