Literature DB >> 15893854

Competition between methicillin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the anterior nares.

M Dall'Antonia1, P G Coen, M Wilks, A Whiley, M Millar.   

Abstract

Colonization of the anterior nares with Staphylococcus aureus has been shown to be a risk factor for infection. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus (MRSA) compete with methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) strains for colonization of the anterior nares. As part of the local National Health Service trust MRSA infection control strategy, patients who have been in a healthcare institution in the last year are routinely sampled and tested for MRSA colonization at the time of hospital admission. The sampling and testing methods were modified for the six-month period of this study to allow the detection of both MSSA and MRSA/MSSA co-colonization. MRSA alone was carried by 56 (8%) of 680 patients, MSSA alone by 115 patients (17%), 505 patients (74.3%) carried neither, and four patients (0.6%) carried both MRSA and MSSA. The deviance between the observed number of co-colonized swabs and that expected under the null hypothesis of no competition between MSSA and MRSA was significant (P=0.02, Fisher's exact test). The statistical approach is unaffected by the confounding effect of factors that affect the relative frequencies of MRSA or MSSA colonization. When logistic regression was used to estimate the extent of competition, controlling for effects of age and sex, we estimated a protective efficacy of MSSA colonization in the prevention of MRSA colonization of 78% (95% CI 29-99%). Results from this cross-sectional study support the hypothesis that MRSA and MSSA compete for colonization space, and provides an estimate of the extent to which MSSA interferes with MRSA colonization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15893854     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  30 in total

1.  Colonization and transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in nursery piglets.

Authors:  Florence Crombé; Wannes Vanderhaeghen; Jeroen Dewulf; Katleen Hermans; Freddy Haesebrouck; Patrick Butaye
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Antimicrobial Activity of Bacillus subtilis KATMIRA1933 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 Against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Isolated from Wound Infection.

Authors:  Ammar Algburi; Halah M Al-Hasani; Thurya K Ismael; Alyaa Abdelhameed; Richard Weeks; Aleksey M Ermakov; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus replacing methicillin-susceptible S. aureus?

Authors:  Elizabeth Mostofsky; Marc Lipsitch; Gili Regev-Yochay
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Hospital clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are carried by medical students even before healthcare exposure.

Authors:  Daniel Glikman; Avi Peretz; Ido Orlin; Assaf Rokney; Avi Onn
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 5.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease.

Authors:  Nathan K Archer; Mark J Mazaitis; J William Costerton; Jeff G Leid; Mary Elizabeth Powers; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.882

6.  Recombination between ccrC genes in a type V (5C2&5) staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) of Staphylococcus aureus ST398 leads to conversion from methicillin resistance to methicillin susceptibility in vivo.

Authors:  Monika A Chlebowicz; Kristelle Nganou; Svitlana Kozytska; Jan P Arends; Susanne Engelmann; Hajo Grundmann; Knut Ohlsen; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Girbe Buist
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Impact of antibiotic exposure patterns on selection of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospital settings.

Authors:  Lidia Kardas-Sloma; Pierre Yves Boëlle; Lulla Opatowski; Christian Brun-Buisson; Didier Guillemot; Laura Temime
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Optimal drug synergy in antimicrobial treatments.

Authors:  Joseph Peter Torella; Remy Chait; Roy Kishony
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Fluoroquinolone Impact on Nasal Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Colonization Durations in Neurologic Long-Term-Care Facilities.

Authors:  Clotilde Couderc; Anne C M Thiébaut; Christine Lawrence; Coralie Bouchiat; Jean-Louis Herrmann; Jérôme Salomon; Didier Guillemot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Targeted intranasal mupirocin to prevent colonization and infection by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in soldiers: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael W Ellis; Matthew E Griffith; David P Dooley; Joseph C McLean; James H Jorgensen; Jan E Patterson; Kepler A Davis; Joshua S Hawley; Jason A Regules; Robert G Rivard; Paula J Gray; Julia M Ceremuga; Mary A Dejoseph; Duane R Hospenthal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.