Literature DB >> 17682105

Targeted intranasal mupirocin to prevent colonization and infection by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in soldiers: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Michael W Ellis1, Matthew E Griffith, David P Dooley, Joseph C McLean, James H Jorgensen, Jan E Patterson, Kepler A Davis, Joshua S Hawley, Jason A Regules, Robert G Rivard, Paula J Gray, Julia M Ceremuga, Mary A Dejoseph, Duane R Hospenthal.   

Abstract

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is an emerging pathogen that primarily manifests as uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. We conducted a cluster randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether targeted intranasal mupirocin therapy in CA-MRSA-colonized soldiers could prevent infection in the treated individual and prevent new colonization and infection within their study groups. We screened 3,447 soldiers comprising 14 training classes for CA-MRSA colonization from January to December 2005. Each training class was randomized to either the mupirocin or placebo study group, and the participants identified as CA-MRSA colonized were treated with either mupirocin or placebo. All participants underwent repeat screening after 8 to 10 weeks and were monitored for 16 weeks for development of infection. Of 3,447 participants screened, 134 (3.9%) were initially colonized with CA-MRSA. Five of 65 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.0% to 11.4%) placebo-treated participants and 7 of 66 (10.6%; 95% CI, 7.9% to 13.3%) mupirocin-treated participants developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo- and mupirocin-treated groups was -2.9% (95% CI, -7.5% to 1.7%). Of those not initially colonized with CA-MRSA, 63 of 1,459 (4.3%; 95% CI, 2.7% to 5.9%) of the placebo group and 56 of 1,607 (3.5%; 95% CI, 2.6% to 5.2%) of the mupirocin group developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.8% (95% CI, -1.0% to 2.7%). Of 3,447 participants, 3,066 (89%) were available for the second sampling and completed follow-up. New CA-MRSA colonization occurred in 24 of 1,459 (1.6%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.8%) of the placebo group participants and 23 of 1,607 (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.3%) of the mupirocin group participants; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.2% (95% CI, -1.3% to 1.7%). Despite CA-MRSA eradication in colonized participants, this study showed no decrease in infections in either the mupirocin-treated individuals or within their study group. Furthermore, CA-MRSA eradication did not prevent new colonization within the study group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17682105      PMCID: PMC2043273          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01086-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  51 in total

Review 1.  Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks.

Authors:  J Kluytmans; A van Belkum; H Verbrugh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance.

Authors:  R E WILLIAMS
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1963-03

3.  Interpretive criteria for testing susceptibility of staphylococci to mupirocin.

Authors:  J E Finlay; L A Miller; J A Poupard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high school wrestling team and the surrounding community.

Authors:  J M Lindenmayer; S Schoenfeld; R O'Grady; J K Carney
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-27

Review 5.  Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.

Authors:  F C Tenover; R D Arbeit; R V Goering; P A Mickelsen; B E Murray; D H Persing; B Swaminathan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  The emergence of mupirocin resistance: a challenge to infection control and antibiotic prescribing practice.

Authors:  B D Cookson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Development of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after widespread use of nasal mupirocin ointment.

Authors:  M A Miller; A Dascal; J Portnoy; J Mendelson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Nasal mupirocin prevents Staphylococcus aureus exit-site infection during peritoneal dialysis. Mupirocin Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection in patients on hemodialysis. Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  V L Yu; A Goetz; M Wagener; P B Smith; J D Rihs; J Hanchett; J J Zuravleff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-07-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Long-term efficacy of intranasal mupirocin ointment. A prospective cohort study of Staphylococcus aureus carriage.

Authors:  B N Doebbeling; D R Reagan; M A Pfaller; A K Houston; R J Hollis; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-07-11
View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Colonization, pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and therapeutics for Staphylococcus aureus: what is the clinical relevance?

Authors:  Steven Y C Tong; Luke F Chen; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 2.  Prevention of Recurrent Staphylococcal Skin Infections.

Authors:  C Buddy Creech; Duha N Al-Zubeidi; Stephanie A Fritz
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.982

3.  Presence and molecular epidemiology of virulence factors in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing and infecting soldiers.

Authors:  Michael W Ellis; Matthew E Griffith; James H Jorgensen; Duane R Hospenthal; Katrin Mende; Jan E Patterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: Management and Prevention.

Authors:  Luke F Chen; Cody Chastain; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Hygiene strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections: a cluster-randomized controlled trial among high-risk military trainees.

Authors:  Michael W Ellis; Carey D Schlett; Eugene V Millar; Kenneth J Wilkins; Katrina B Crawford; Stephanie M Morrison-Rodriguez; Laura A Pacha; Rachel J Gorwitz; Jeffrey B Lanier; David R Tribble
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Concordance of PCR and culture from nasal swabs for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a setting of concurrent antistaphylococcal antibiotics.

Authors:  Erica S Shenoy; Farzad Noubary; Jiyeon Kim; Eric S Rosenberg; Jessica A Cotter; Hang Lee; Rochelle P Walensky; David C Hooper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Opportunities and Obstacles in the Prevention of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections Among Military Personnel.

Authors:  Eugene V Millar; Carey D Schlett; Natasha N Law; Timothy J Whitman; Michael W Ellis; David R Tribble; Jason W Bennett
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Carrie W Nemerovski; Kristin C Klein
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-10

Review 10.  Looking toward basic science for potential drug discovery targets against community-associated MRSA.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.