Literature DB >> 15891999

Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.

Henrik Helin1, Mikael Lundin, Johan Lundin, Paula Martikainen, Teuvo Tammela, Heikki Helin, Theo van der Kwast, Jorma Isola.   

Abstract

Gleason grading forms the basis of prognostic and therapeutic assessment in prostatic carcinoma despite its subjective nature and substantial interobserver variation. The accuracy of Gleason grading can be improved by the use of educational tools such as reference images. However, conventional microscopy images are of limited educational value because it is neither possible to view the sample at different magnifications nor to navigate into different areas of the specimen. This limitation can be overcome by the use of virtual microscopy, which allows viewing entire digitized microscope slides. We created an interactive Web site ( www.webmicroscope.net/gleason ) featuring a comprehensive set of prostatic needle biopsies as virtual slides, which can be viewed with a standard Web browser (Internet Explorer or Netscape). To evaluate the validity of Web-based virtual microscopy for Gleason grading, an experienced uropathologist (TK) scored a series of 62 biopsies from the original glass slides and 6 weeks later from virtual slides on the Web site using an ordinary desktop computer. The intraobserver agreement was excellent, with identical Gleason scores found in 48 of the 62 cases ( kappa = 0.73). The 14 remaining scores differed only by 1 point on the Gleason scale (2-10). The virtual slides were viewed by 2 other uropathologists (PM and HH), with interobserver kappa coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.62, which is within the range of previously reported studies using glass slides. The 3 uropathologists' Gleason scores were included as reference scores on the Web site, which now serves as a publicly open platform for self-testing and learning of Gleason grading. We conclude that Web-based virtual microscopy is a promising new tool for teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891999     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  21 in total

Review 1.  Factors to keep in mind when introducing virtual microscopy.

Authors:  Katharina Glatz-Krieger; Udo Spornitz; Alain Spatz; Michael J Mihatsch; Dieter Glatz
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  The application of JPEG2000 in virtual microscopy.

Authors:  Vilppu J Tuominen; Jorma Isola
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Diagnostic pathology and laboratory medicine in the age of "omics": a paper from the 2006 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  William G Finn
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  A European network for virtual microscopy--design, implementation and evaluation of performance.

Authors:  Mikael Lundin; Janusz Szymas; Ewert Linder; Hans Beck; Peter de Wilde; Han van Krieken; Marcial García Rojo; Ignacio Moreno; Aurelio Ariza; Sitki Tuzlali; Sergülen Dervişoğlu; Heikki Helin; Veli-Pekka Lehto; Johan Lundin
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  A web-based solution for viewing large-sized microscopic images.

Authors:  Chung-Yueh Lien; Hsu-Chih Teng; Deng-Ji Chen; Woei-Chyn Chu; Chia-Hung Hsiao
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Ronald S Weinstein; Matthew R Dunn; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.536

7.  A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Nancy Joste; Brigette M Ronnett; Mark Stoler; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Frequency and determinants of disagreement and error in gleason scores: a population-based study of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Goodman; Kevin C Ward; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Milton W Datta; Daniel Luthringer; Andrew N Young; Katerina Marks; Vaunita Cohen; Jan C Kennedy; Michael J Haber; Mahul B Amin
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  Development and use of a genitourinary pathology digital teaching set for trainee education.

Authors:  Li Li; Bryan J Dangott; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2010-05-26

10.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.