Literature DB >> 15891829

Precipitation pulse use by an invasive woody legume: the role of soil texture and pulse size.

Alessandra Fravolini1, Kevin R Hultine, Enrico Brugnoli, Rico Gazal, Nathan B English, David G Williams.   

Abstract

Plant metabolic activity in arid and semi-arid environments is largely tied to episodic precipitation events or "pulses". The ability of plants to take up and utilize rain pulses during the growing season in these water-limited ecosystems is determined in part by pulse timing, intensity and amount, and by hydrological properties of the soil that translate precipitation into plant-available soil moisture. We assessed the sensitivity of an invasive woody plant, velvet mesquite (Prosopis velutina Woot.), to large (35 mm) and small (10 mm) isotopically labeled irrigation pulses on two contrasting soil textures (sandy-loam vs. loamy-clay) in semi-desert grassland in southeastern Arizona, USA. Predawn leaf water potential (psi(pd)), the isotopic abundance of deuterium in stem water (deltaD), the abundance of 13C in soluble leaf sugar (delta13C), and percent volumetric soil water content (theta(v)) were measured prior to irrigation and repeatedly for 2 weeks following irrigation. Plant water potential and the percent of pulse water present in the stem xylem indicated that although mesquite trees on both coarse- and fine-textured soils quickly responded to the large irrigation pulse, the magnitude and duration of this response substantially differed between soil textures. After reaching a maximum 4 days after the irrigation, the fraction of pulse water in stem xylem decreased more rapidly on the loamy-clay soil than the sandy-loam soil. Similarly, on both soil textures mesquite significantly responded to the 10-mm pulse. However, the magnitude of this response was substantially greater for mesquite on the sandy-loam soil compared to loamy-clay soil. The relationship between psi(pd) and delta13C of leaf-soluble carbohydrates over the pulse period did not differ between plants at the two sites, indicating that differences in photosynthetic response of mesquite trees to the moisture pulses was a function of soil water availability within the rooting zone rather than differences in plant biochemical or physiological constraints. Patterns of resource acquisition by mesquite during the dynamic wetting-drying cycle following rainfall pulses is controlled by a complex interaction between pulse size and soil hydraulic properties. A better understanding of how this interaction affects plant water availability and photosynthetic response is needed to predict how grassland structure and function will respond to climate change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891829     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0078-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Partitioning of soil water among tree species in a Brazilian Cerrado ecosystem.

Authors:  Paula C. Jackson; Frederick C. Meinzer; Mercedes Bustamante; Guillermo Goldstein; Augusto Franco; Philip W. Rundel; Linda Caldas; Erica Igler; Fabio Causin
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 2.  A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes.

Authors:  R B Jackson; J Canadell; J R Ehleringer; H A Mooney; O E Sala; E D Schulze
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Differential use of large summer rainfall events by shrubs and grasses: a manipulative experiment in the Patagonian steppe.

Authors:  R A Golluscio; O E Sala; W K Lauenroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Spatial and temporal soil moisture resource partitioning by trees and grasses in a temperate savanna, Arizona, USA.

Authors:  Jake F Weltzin; Guy R McPherson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Deuterium enriched irrigation indicates different forms of rain use in shrub/grass species of the Colorado Plateau.

Authors:  Susanne Schwinning; Kim Davis; Leah Richardson; James R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Influence of soil porosity on water use in Pinus taeda.

Authors:  U G Hacke; J S Sperry; B E Ewers; D S Ellsworth; K V R Schäfer; R Oren
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Monosoonal precipitation responses of shrubs in a cold desert community on the Colorado Plateau.

Authors:  Guanghui Lin; Susan L Phillips; James R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Response of net ecosystem gas exchange to a simulated precipitation pulse in a semi-arid grassland: the role of native versus non-native grasses and soil texture.

Authors:  Travis E Huxman; Jessica M Cable; Danielle D Ignace; J Alex Eilts; Nathan B English; Jake Weltzin; David G Williams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Dominant cold desert plants do not partition warm season precipitation by event size.

Authors:  Susanne Schwinning; Benjamin I Starr; James R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Carbon isotope discrimination and foliar nutrient status of Larrea tridentata (creosote bush) in contrasting Mojave Desert soils.

Authors:  Erik P Hamerlynck; Travis E Huxman; Joseph R McAuliffe; Stanley D Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  12 in total

1.  Root niche partitioning among grasses, saplings, and trees measured using a tracer technique.

Authors:  Andrew Kulmatiski; Karen H Beard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Stable isotopes in ecological studies.

Authors:  David R Thompson; Sarah J Bury; Keith A Hobson; Leonard I Wassenaar; Joseph P Shannon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The sensitivity of ecosystem carbon exchange to seasonal precipitation and woody plant encroachment.

Authors:  D L Potts; T E Huxman; R L Scott; D G Williams; D C Goodrich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Response of transpiration to rain pulses for two tree species in a semiarid plantation.

Authors:  Lixin Chen; Zhiqiang Zhang; Melanie Zeppel; Caifeng Liu; Junting Guo; Jinzhao Zhu; Xuepei Zhang; Jianjun Zhang; Tonggang Zha
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Moderately prolonged dry intervals between precipitation events promote production in Leymus chinensis in a semi-arid grassland of Northeast China.

Authors:  Jinwei Zhang; Xiangjin Shen; Bifan Mu; Yujie Shi; Yuheng Yang; Xuefeng Wu; Chunsheng Mu; Junfeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Stable isotope approaches and opportunities for improving plant conservation.

Authors:  Keirith A Snyder; Sharon A Robinson; Susanne Schmidt; Kevin R Hultine
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  The water relations of two evergreen tree species in a karst savanna.

Authors:  Susanne Schwinning
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Complexity in water and carbon dioxide fluxes following rain pulses in an African savanna.

Authors:  Christopher Alan Williams; Niall Hanan; Robert J Scholes; Werner Kutsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Sap flow characteristics and responses to summer rainfall for Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides in the Loess hilly region of China.

Authors:  Xu Wu; Yakun Tang; Yunming Chen; Jie Wen; Yuli Xie; Senbao Lu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Interactive effects of severe drought and grazing on the life history cycle of a bioindicator species.

Authors:  Sarah Rebecah Fritts; Blake A Grisham; Robert D Cox; Clint W Boal; David A Haukos; Patricia McDaniel; Christian A Hagen; Daniel U Greene
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.