Literature DB >> 28307854

A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes.

R B Jackson1, J Canadell2, J R Ehleringer3, H A Mooney2, O E Sala4, E D Schulze5.   

Abstract

Understanding and predicting ecosystem functioning (e.g., carbon and water fluxes) and the role of soils in carbon storage requires an accurate assessment of plant rooting distributions. Here, in a comprehensive literature synthesis, we analyze rooting patterns for terrestrial biomes and compare distributions for various plant functional groups. We compiled a database of 250 root studies, subdividing suitable results into 11 biomes, and fitted the depth coefficient β to the data for each biome (Gale and Grigal 1987). β is a simple numerical index of rooting distribution based on the asymptotic equation Y=1-βd, where d = depth and Y = the proportion of roots from the surface to depth d. High values of β correspond to a greater proportion of roots with depth. Tundra, boreal forest, and temperate grasslands showed the shallowest rooting profiles (β=0.913, 0.943, and 0.943, respectively), with 80-90% of roots in the top 30 cm of soil; deserts and temperate coniferous forests showed the deepest profiles (β=0.975 and 0.976, respectively) and had only 50% of their roots in the upper 30 cm. Standing root biomass varied by over an order of magnitude across biomes, from approximately 0.2 to 5 kg m-2. Tropical evergreen forests had the highest root biomass (5 kg m-2), but other forest biomes and sclerophyllous shrublands were of similar magnitude. Root biomass for croplands, deserts, tundra and grasslands was below 1.5 kg m-2. Root/shoot (R/S) ratios were highest for tundra, grasslands, and cold deserts (ranging from 4 to 7); forest ecosystems and croplands had the lowest R/S ratios (approximately 0.1 to 0.5). Comparing data across biomes for plant functional groups, grasses had 44% of their roots in the top 10 cm of soil. (β=0.952), while shrubs had only 21% in the same depth increment (β=0.978). The rooting distribution of all temperate and tropical trees was β=0.970 with 26% of roots in the top 10 cm and 60% in the top 30 cm. Overall, the globally averaged root distribution for all ecosystems was β=0.966 (r 2=0.89) with approximately 30%, 50%, and 75% of roots in the top 10 cm, 20 cm, and 40 cm, respectively. We discuss the merits and possible shortcomings of our analysis in the context of root biomass and root functioning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cumulative root fraction; Root biomass; Rooting density; Soil depth; Terrestrial biomes

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307854     DOI: 10.1007/BF00333714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment.

Authors:  R B Jackson; J H Manwaring; M M Caldwell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mechanisms of nitrogen retention in forest ecosystems: a field experiment.

Authors:  P M Vitousek; P A Matson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model.

Authors:  J W Raich; E B Rastetter; J M Melillo; D W Kicklighter; P A Steudler; B J Peterson; A L Grace; B Moore; C J Vorosmarty
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 4.  Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.

Authors:  J Canadell; R B Jackson; J B Ehleringer; H A Mooney; O E Sala; E-D Schulze
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Spatial partitioning of the soil water resource between grass and shrub components in a West African humid savanna.

Authors:  X Le Roux; T Bariac; A Mariotti
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Root systems of chaparral shrubs.

Authors:  Jochen Kummerow; David Krause; William Jow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in Patagonia.

Authors:  E -D Schulze; H A Mooney; O E Sala; E Jobbagy; N Buchmann; G Bauer; J Canadell; R B Jackson; J Loreti; M Oesterheld; J R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  106 in total

1.  Modelling cereal root systems for water and nitrogen capture: towards an economic optimum.

Authors:  John King; Alan Gay; Roger Sylvester-Bradley; Ian Bingham; John Foulkes; Peter Gregory; David Robinson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Productivity responses to altered rainfall patterns in a C4-dominated grassland.

Authors:  Philip A Fay; Jonathan D Carlisle; Alan K Knapp; John M Blair; Scott L Collins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Covariation in leaf and root traits for native and non-native grasses along an altitudinal gradient in New Zealand.

Authors:  J M Craine; W G Lee
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  A multi-scale perspective of water pulses in dryland ecosystems: climatology and ecohydrology of the western USA.

Authors:  Michael E Loik; David D Breshears; William K Lauenroth; Jayne Belnap
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems.

Authors:  Susanne Schwinning; Osvaldo E Sala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays.

Authors:  Kiona Ogle; James F Reynolds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Colonization and community structure of root-associated microorganisms of Sabina vulgaris with soil depth in a semiarid desert ecosystem with shallow groundwater.

Authors:  Takeshi Taniguchi; Hiroyuki Usuki; Junichi Kikuchi; Muneto Hirobe; Naoko Miki; Kenji Fukuda; Guosheng Zhang; Linhe Wang; Ken Yoshikawa; Norikazu Yamanaka
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.387

8.  Co-assessment of biomass and soil organic carbon stocks in a future reservoir area located in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Stéphane Descloux; Vincent Chanudet; Hervé Poilvé; Alain Grégoire
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Enhanced precipitation variability decreases grass- and increases shrub-productivity.

Authors:  Laureano A Gherardi; Osvaldo E Sala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Clustered root distribution in mature stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies.

Authors:  Iris Schmid; Marian Kazda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.