Literature DB >> 15891192

Efficacy of treatment of severe carotid bifurcation stenosis by using self-expanding stents without deliberate use of angioplasty balloons.

Stephen P Lownie1, David M Pelz, Donald H Lee, Suleyman Men, Irene Gulka, Paul Kalapos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: One of the limitations of carotid artery angioplasty is the potential for embolic stroke. Our purpose was to assess whether the force of a self-expanding stent alone is usually sufficient to dilate severely stenotic atherosclerotic plaques without the deliberate use of an angioplasty balloon. If so, the procedural stroke risk might be reduced.
METHODS: Over a 30-month period, 21 consecutive patients were prospectively identified with severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (>70% NASCET [North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial]) and relative indications for endovascular treatment. All underwent treatment with the aim of deploying a self-expanding stent across the stenosis without the use of angioplasty balloons or distal protection devices.
RESULTS: Stent deployment was successful in 20/21 patients. In one patient, the stent could not be deployed without balloon predilatation and a stroke occurred. In the other 20 patients, angiography before and immediately after stent deployment showed a reduction in the mean stenosis from 83% to 49%. A second periprocedural stroke occurred as a result of early stent thrombosis at 4 days in a patient who stopped Acetylsalicylic acid while undergoing bowel preparation for colon surgery. He made a good recovery. Average duration of follow-up imaging was 19 months (range, 1-44 months). During the follow-up period there were four deaths, all unrelated to the carotid disease, and no major strokes. At 5-11 months, the average residual stenosis was 21%, which remained stable in 16 of the 18 patients studied between 12 and 44 months (average, 24 months). At last follow-up, in these 16 the mean peak systolic velocity was 123 cm/s (range, 60-238 cm/s) and the mean internal-to-common carotid ratio was 1.8. The other two patients were long-term failures of the "stent-only" approach. In one patient, a heavily calcified plaque prevented stent expansion and the artery occluded at 18 months with a minor stroke. In the second patient, a recurrent stenosis developed at 16 months with one episode of transient ischemic attack.
CONCLUSION: Deployment of a self-expanding stent alone resulted in a favorable and more gradual reduction of severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. Improvements in stent profile and chronic outward force may widen the indications for simple stent placement without the use of balloons or adjunctive protection devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891192      PMCID: PMC8158633     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  37 in total

1.  Endovascular stenting for carotid artery stenosis: preliminary experience using the shape-memory- alloy-recoverable-technology (SMART) stent.

Authors:  C C Phatouros; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; T E Lempert; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Continued expansion of the nitinol self-expanding coronary stent: angiographic analysis and 1-year clinical follow-up.

Authors:  A Roguin; E Grenadier; S Linn; W Markiewicz; R Beyar
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Occlusive vascular disease in the extracranial cerebral circulation.

Authors:  M J MARTIN; J P WHISNANT; G P SAYRE
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1960-11

4.  Occlusion of the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  M FISHER
Journal:  AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry       Date:  1951-03

5.  Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after stent implantation in the carotid artery.

Authors:  Horst J Jaeger; Klaus D Mathias; Elke Hauth; Robert Drescher; H Martin Gissler; Svenja Hennigs; Andreas Christmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Carotid stenting without angioplasty.

Authors:  S Men; S P Lownie; D M Pelz
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Characteristics of cerebral microembolism during carotid stenting and angioplasty alone.

Authors:  G Orlandi; S Fanucchi; C Fioretti; G Acerbi; M Puglioli; R Padolecchia; F Sartucci; L Murri
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2001-09

8.  Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis.

Authors:  C Rogers; E R Edelman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Carotid artery stent placement for atherosclerotic disease: rationale, technique, and current status.

Authors:  C C Phatouros; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; T E Lempert; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group.

Authors:  P W Serruys; P de Jaegere; F Kiemeneij; C Macaya; W Rutsch; G Heyndrickx; H Emanuelsson; J Marco; V Legrand; P Materne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  Letter - Re: Primary carotid stenting without angioplasty.

Authors:  David M Pelz; Stephen P Lownie
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Novel 3D-CT evaluation of carotid stent volume: greater chronological expansion of stents in patients with vulnerable plaques.

Authors:  Hisakazu Itami; Koji Tokunaga; Yu Okuma; Tomohito Hishikawa; Kenji Sugiu; Kentaro Ida; Isao Date
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Relevance of Distal Arterial Collapse in Stenting of Atherosclerotic Near-Occlusion of the Carotid Artery.

Authors:  F Cay; B E Cil; S Balcı; E M Arsava; M A Topçuoğlu; A Arat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Carotid angioplasty and stenting without protection devices: safety and efficacy concerns--single center experience.

Authors:  O Y Mansour; J Weber; W Niesen; M Schumacher; A Berlis
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Locking between a cerebral protection device and a stent-delivering catheter during carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Jong Hun Lee; Sung Won Youn; Ho Kyun Kim
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 6.  Carotid artery stenting: review of technique and update of recent literature.

Authors:  Sun Ho Ahn; Ethan A Prince; Gregory J Dubel
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Carotid artery stenting for calcified lesions.

Authors:  M Tsutsumi; H Aikawa; M Onizuka; M Iko; T Kodama; K Nii; S Hamaguchi; H Etou; K Sakamoto; K Kazekawa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases.

Authors:  M Maynar; S Baldi; R Rostagno; T Zander; M Rabellino; R Llorens; J Alvarez; F Barajas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Carotid Artery Stent Continued Expansion Days After Deployment, Without Post Stent Deployment Angioplasty.

Authors:  Umair Qazi; Tammam Obeid; Isibor Arhuidese; Mahmoud Malas
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2015-10-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.