Literature DB >> 11559312

Characteristics of cerebral microembolism during carotid stenting and angioplasty alone.

G Orlandi1, S Fanucchi, C Fioretti, G Acerbi, M Puglioli, R Padolecchia, F Sartucci, L Murri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cerebral microembolism has often been documented by transcranial Doppler imaging during carotid angioplasty and stenting. However, few data are available about its characteristics during the 2 different kinds of procedure.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of microemboli occurring during angioplasty alone with that during stenting in the different phases of the procedures and to relate it to periprocedural cerebrovascular complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent 41 procedures (15 angioplasty alone and 26 stenting) for symptomatic carotid stenoses of 70% or more. Transcranial Doppler monitoring was performed to detect microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during 3 phases of the procedure: (1) guidewire crossing, (2) first dilatation in case of angioplasty alone or stent release with predilatation if performed, and (3) further dilatation.
RESULTS: Microemboli occurred in all cases in phase 1 of the procedure but less frequently in the arteries treated with stenting when compared with those treated with angioplasty alone in phase 2 and particularly (P<.02) in phase 3. The mean number of microemboli was highest in phase 2, predominant (P<.05) during angioplasty alone, and particularly reduced (P<.02) in phase 3 during the stenting procedures. During 2 (5%) of the 41 procedures, cerebrovascular complications occurred in phase 1, with the number of microemboli being higher than mean values.
CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral microembolism is a very common event, especially during guidewire crossing and angioplasty alone compared with stenting. Further studies concerning the prognostic significance of this are advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11559312     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.58.9.1410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Proximal protection systems using carotid artery stent].

Authors:  I Q Grunwald; U Dorenbeck; C Axmann; C Roth; T Struffert; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Risk factors for periprocedural complications in carotid artery stenting without filter protection: A serial diffusion-weighted MRI study.

Authors:  Hilmar Krapf; Thomas Nägele; Andreas Kastrup; Udo Bühring; Eckehard Grönewäller; Martin Skalej; Wilhelm Küker
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The significance of incomplete stent apposition in patients undergoing stenting of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  M Onizuka; K Kazekawa; S Nagata; M Tsutsumi; H Aikawa; M Tomokiyo; M Iko; T Kodama; K Nii; S Matsubara; A Tanaka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The amount of solid cerebral microemboli during carotid stenting does not relate to the frequency of silent ischemic lesions.

Authors:  M Rosenkranz; J Fiehler; W Niesen; C Waiblinger; B Eckert; O Wittkugel; T Kucinski; J Röther; H Zeumer; C Weiller; U Sliwka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Spontaneous improvement of persistent ulceration after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  S Kohyama; K Kazekawa; M Iko; H Aikawa; M Tsutsumi; Y Go; S Nagata; T Kodama; K Nii; S Matsubara; A Tanaka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Insight into the periprocedural embolic events of internal carotid artery angioplasty. A report of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  L Jiang; F Ling; B Wang; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Differences in number, size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Holger Poppert; Oliver Wolf; Markus Resch; Wolfram Theiss; Till Schmidt-Thieme; Helga Graefin von Einsiedel; Peter Heider; Stefan Martinoff; Dirk Sander
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Diagnostic workup in carotid stenosis-a neurologist's perspective.

Authors:  Michael Rosenkranz; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Complication rate in unprotected carotid artery stenting with closed-cell stents.

Authors:  Marc W K Tietke; Tina Kerby; Karsten Alfke; Christian Riedel; Axel Rohr; Ulf Jensen; Phillip Zimmermann; Robert Stingele; Olaf Jansen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Efficacy of treatment of severe carotid bifurcation stenosis by using self-expanding stents without deliberate use of angioplasty balloons.

Authors:  Stephen P Lownie; David M Pelz; Donald H Lee; Suleyman Men; Irene Gulka; Paul Kalapos
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.