Literature DB >> 15890810

Relationship between fecal crude protein concentration and diet organic matter digestibility in cattle.

M Lukas1, K-H Südekum, G Rave, K Friedel, A Susenbeth.   

Abstract

The positive relationship between fecal CP concentration and diet OM digestibility in cattle, which is based on increasing undigested microbial CP and decreasing fecal OM as OM digestibility increases, may be used as an indirect method for estimating diet OM digestibility from fecal CP concentration. Results of digestibility trials (445 individual observations) conducted at Hohenheim and Braunschweig, Germany, and at Gumpenstein, Austria, were used to study the relationship between CP concentration in feces (x, g/kg OM) and OM digestibility (y, %). The best fit was obtained with the curvilinear relationship y = ai -107.7e(-0.01515 x x), with a1 = 79.76 and a2 = 72.86 (R2 = 0.82; residual SD = 2.7; SE = 0.13), which takes into account the effects of location (i = 1 for Braunschweig and Hohenheim, and i = 2 for Gumpenstein). Dietary CP and crude fat concentration, and DMI had no effect on fecal CP content, whereas crude fiber content, proportion of concentrate in the diet, and forage type significantly affected CP concentration in feces; however, the magnitude of these effects was less than 2 percentage units, and the direction of the effect of proportion of concentrate in the diet was not uniform. The curvilinear relationship between fecal CP concentration (observed range, 100 to 300 g/kg of OM) and diet OM digestibility (observed range = 57 to 80%) may be used to estimate diet OM digestibility, particularly for field trials, as it requires no feed samples and does not physically restrict the animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890810     DOI: 10.2527/2005.8361332x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Species-specific responses of N homeostasis and electrolyte handling to low N intake: a comparative physiological approach in a monogastric and a ruminant species.

Authors:  S Starke; C Cox; K-H Südekum; K Huber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Particle size reduction along the digestive tract of fat sand rats (Psammomys obesus) fed four chenopods.

Authors:  Elena I Naumova; Tatyana Y Chistova; Galina K Zharova; Michael Kam; Irina S Khokhlova; Boris R Krasnov; Marcus Clauss; A Allan Degen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Effects of Type of Concentrate and Timing of Supplementation on Feed Intake, Nitrogen Use, and Performance in Lactating Dairy Cows Grazing an Alfalfa-Ryegrass Sward.

Authors:  Uta Dickhoefer; Pedro Alan Sainz-Sanchez; Gustavo Rojas; Joaquín Miguel Castro-Montoya; Carlos Gomez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Enteric methane emissions by young Brahman bulls grazing tropical pastures at different rainfall seasons in the Peruvian jungle.

Authors:  Medardo Díaz-Céspedes; José Eduard Hernández-Guevara; Carlos Gómez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Nutritional and ecological evaluation of dairy farming systems based on concentrate feeding regimes in semi-arid environments of Jordan.

Authors:  Othman Alqaisi; Torsten Hemme; Martin Hagemann; Andreas Susenbeth
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Herbivory and body size: allometries of diet quality and gastrointestinal physiology, and implications for herbivore ecology and dinosaur gigantism.

Authors:  Marcus Clauss; Patrick Steuer; Dennis W H Müller; Daryl Codron; Jürgen Hummel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Body fat mobilization in early lactation influences methane production of dairy cows.

Authors:  A Bielak; M Derno; A Tuchscherer; H M Hammon; A Susenbeth; B Kuhla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fecal Nutrients Suggest Diets of Higher Fiber Levels in Free-Ranging than in Captive Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis larvatus).

Authors:  Ikki Matsuda; Henry Bernard; Augustine Tuuga; Sen K S S Nathan; John C M Sha; Ismon Osman; Rosa Sipangkui; Satoru Seino; Sanae Asano; Anna Wong; Michael Kreuzer; Diana A Ramirez Saldivar; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-01-19

9.  Effect of Limit-Fed Diets With Different Forage to Concentrate Ratios on Fecal Bacterial and Archaeal Community Composition in Holstein Heifers.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Haitao Shi; Yajing Wang; Zhijun Cao; Hongjian Yang; Shengli Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.