Literature DB >> 15890421

Acute esophageal toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients after high dose conformal radiotherapy.

Jose Belderbos1, Wilma Heemsbergen, Mischa Hoogeman, Kenneth Pengel, Maddalena Rossi, Joos Lebesque.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To correlate acute esophageal toxicity with dosimetric and clinical parameters for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone or with chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data of 156 patients with medically inoperable or locally advanced NSCLC. Seventy-four patients were irradiated with high dose RT only, 45 patients with sequential CRT (Gemicitabine/Cisplatin) and 37 patients with concurrent CRT (Cisplatin daily 6 mg/m(2)). The radiation dose delivered ranged from 49.5 to 94.5 Gy (2.25-2.75 Gy per fraction) with an overall treatment time of 5-6 weeks. For all patients the maximal acute esophageal toxicity (RTOG/EORTC criteria) was scored and related to dose-volume parameters, as well as to clinical and treatment-related parameters. All parameters were tested univariable and multivariable in a binary logistic regression model. The toxicity data of a homogeneous subgroup was fitted to the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model.
RESULTS: Grade 2 acute esophageal toxicity or higher occurred in 27% (n=42) of the patient population of which nine patients developed grade 3 toxicity and one patient grade 4. All 10 patients with grade>or=3 esophageal toxicity received concurrent CRT. At multivariable analysis, the most significant clinical parameter to predict acute esophageal toxicity was the concurrent use of CRT. The most significant dosimetric parameter was the esophagus volume that received at least 35 Gy. The data of the patients who did not receive concurrent CRT were well described by the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability model. The optimal fit of the data of non-concurrent treated patients to this model was obtained using the following values for the parameters: TD(50)=47 Gy (41-60 Gy), n=0.69 (0.18-6.3) and m=0.36 (0.25-0.55) where the numbers between brackets denote the 95% confidence interval. Acute esophageal toxicity was not significantly increased for patients treated with sequential CRT.
CONCLUSION: Both concurrent CRT and the volume that receives at least 35 Gy were predictors of acute esophageal toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890421     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  46 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the esophagus.

Authors:  Maria Werner-Wasik; Ellen Yorke; Joseph Deasy; Jiho Nam; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Adjuvant intensity-modulated proton therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. A comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and a spot size variation assessment.

Authors:  S Lorentini; M Amichetti; L Spiazzi; S Tonoli; S M Magrini; F Fellin; M Schwarz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning based on manual and automatically generated contours using deformable image registration in four-dimensional computed tomography of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Elisabeth Weiss; Krishni Wijesooriya; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Dose-mass inverse optimization for minimally moving thoracic lesions.

Authors:  I B Mihaylov; E G Moros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Limiting the risk of cardiac toxicity with esophageal-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancers.

Authors:  Katrina Woodford; Vanessa Panettieri; Jeremy D Ruben; Sashendra Senthi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Overcoming toxicity-challenges in chemoradiation for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wilma Uyterlinde
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06

7.  Digestive toxicities after palliative three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for cervico-thoracic spinal metastases.

Authors:  Guillaume Peyraga; Delphine Caron; Thibaut Lizee; Yann Metayer; Anne-Lise Septans; Yoann Pointreau; Fabrice Denis; Gerard Ganem; Cedrik Lafond; Sophie Roche; Olivier Dupuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Esophagitis, treatment-related toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Voichita Bar-Ad; Nitin Ohri; Maria Werner-Wasik
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02

9.  New approach in lung cancer radiotherapy offers better normal tissue sparing.

Authors:  Ivaylo B Mihaylov
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Is there a selection bias in radiotherapy dose-escalation protocols?

Authors:  Elisabeth Weiss; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.