OBJECTIVE: To compare the estimation of body fat between bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in overweight, African-American female adolescents. SUBJECTS: In total, 54 African-American adolescent female subjects were recruited for Study 1. Each adolescent's body mass index was greater than the 85th percentile and their average body fat was 45% according to DEXA. A total of 26 African-American adolescent female subjects were available for Study 2, and had an average body fat of 26% according to DEXA. MEASUREMENTS: Percent body fat was measured by DEXA and BIA. Seven different BIA equations were tested. Both sets of data were analyzed using Bland-Altman regression analyses, utilizing percent body fat measured by DEXA as the criterion. RESULTS: The Kushner equation provided estimates that were unaffected by body fat in both studies. Estimates were unbiased when applied to the exclusively overweight sample and biased when utilized with the separate sample of normal weight and obese girls. The remaining equations were biased, provided inconsistent estimates across body weight, or were biased and provided inconsistent estimates. Ethnicity-specific and ethnicity-combined equations performed similarly in the obese sample, but became more disparate when applied to a sample encompassing a wider body weight range. The limits of agreement between all BIA equations and the DEXA estimates ranged from 6 to 9%. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the Kushner BIA equation is appropriate for use with African-American female adolescents across the weight spectrum, while the majority of BIA equations underestimated percent body fat as body fat increased.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the estimation of body fat between bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in overweight, African-American female adolescents. SUBJECTS: In total, 54 African-American adolescent female subjects were recruited for Study 1. Each adolescent's body mass index was greater than the 85th percentile and their average body fat was 45% according to DEXA. A total of 26 African-American adolescent female subjects were available for Study 2, and had an average body fat of 26% according to DEXA. MEASUREMENTS: Percent body fat was measured by DEXA and BIA. Seven different BIA equations were tested. Both sets of data were analyzed using Bland-Altman regression analyses, utilizing percent body fat measured by DEXA as the criterion. RESULTS: The Kushner equation provided estimates that were unaffected by body fat in both studies. Estimates were unbiased when applied to the exclusively overweight sample and biased when utilized with the separate sample of normal weight and obesegirls. The remaining equations were biased, provided inconsistent estimates across body weight, or were biased and provided inconsistent estimates. Ethnicity-specific and ethnicity-combined equations performed similarly in the obese sample, but became more disparate when applied to a sample encompassing a wider body weight range. The limits of agreement between all BIA equations and the DEXA estimates ranged from 6 to 9%. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the Kushner BIA equation is appropriate for use with African-American female adolescents across the weight spectrum, while the majority of BIA equations underestimated percent body fat as body fat increased.
Authors: Alessia Grigoletto; Mario Mauro; Alberto Oppio; Gianpiero Greco; Francesco Fischetti; Stefania Cataldi; Stefania Toselli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Amber B Courville; Shanna B Yang; Sarah Andrus; Nosheen Hayat; Anneliese Kuemmerle; Elizabeth Leahy; Sara Briker; Kirsten Zambell; Stephanie Chung; Anne E Sumner Journal: Nutrition Date: 2020-01-18 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Sabine Makkes; Jutka Halberstadt; Carry M Renders; Judith E Bosmans; Olga H van der Baan-Slootweg; Jacob C Seidell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Simon Lee; Vassiliki Bountziouka; Sooky Lum; Janet Stocks; Rachel Bonner; Mitesh Naik; Helen Fothergill; Jonathan C K Wells Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sabine Makkes; Carry M Renders; Judith E Bosmans; Olga H van der Baan-Slootweg; Jacob C Seidell Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Materko Wollner; Benchimol-Barbosa Paulo Roberto; Silva Carvalho Alysson Roncally; Nadal Jurandir; Luis Santos Edil Journal: J Public Health Res Date: 2017-09-21