Literature DB >> 15888715

Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of acute Jones fractures.

Timothy S Mologne1, Jeffrey M Lundeen, Mark F Clapper, Thomas J O'Brien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is considerable variability in the literature concerning the optimal treatment of acute Jones fractures. HYPOTHESIS: Early surgical fixation of acute Jones fractures will result in shorter times to union and return to athletics compared with cast treatment. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: Eighteen patients were randomized to cast treatment, and 19 patients were randomized to screw fixation. Success of treatment and the times to union and return to sports were calculated for each patient.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 25.3 months (range, 15-42 months). Eight of 18 (44%) in the cast group were considered treatment failures: 5 nonunions, 1 delayed union, and 2 refractures. One of 19 patients in the surgery group was considered a treatment failure. For the surgery group, the median times to union and return to sports were 7.5 and 8.0 weeks, respectively. For the cast group, the median times were 14.5 and 15.0 weeks, respectively. The Mann-Whitney test showed a statistically significant difference between the groups in both parameters, with P < 001.
CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence (44%) of failure after cast treatment of acute Jones fractures. Early screw fixation results in quicker times to union and return to sports compared with cast treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15888715     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504272262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  26 in total

1.  Intramedullary screw fixation of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures in athletes.

Authors:  Marta Maria Teixeira de Oliveira Massada; Manuel Alexandre Negrais Pinho Gonçalves Pereira; Ricardo Jorge Gomes de Sousa; Paulo Guimarães Costa; José Leandro da Rocha Massada
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

2.  Radiographic classification for fractures of the fifth metatarsal base.

Authors:  Alexander T Mehlhorn; Jörn Zwingmann; Anja Hirschmüller; Norbert P Südkamp; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  [Metatarsal and toe fractures].

Authors:  M Beck; A Wichelhaus; R Rotter; P Gierer; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Fractures in sport: Optimising their management and outcome.

Authors:  Greg Aj Robertson; Alexander M Wood
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 5.  [Incorrect aftercare of a surgically treated metatarsal fracture].

Authors:  M Zyskowski; M Wurm; T Neuhof
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Surgical results of 5th metatarsal stress fracture using modified tension band wiring.

Authors:  Kyung Tai Lee; Young Uk Park; Ki Won Young; Jin Su Kim; Jun Beom Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: percutaneous bicortical fixation.

Authors:  Vivek Mahajan; Hyun Wook Chung; Jin Soo Suh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-05-12

Review 8.  [Fractures of the base of the V metatarsal bone-current concepts revised].

Authors:  S F Baumbach; W C Prall; M Braunstein; W Böcker; S Polzer; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Is nonoperative treatment still indicated for Jones fracture?

Authors:  Chiu Chee-Kidd; Ajit S Vivek
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 10.  Treatment and return to sport following a Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew J Roche; James D F Calder
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.