Literature DB >> 29777283

[Fractures of the base of the V metatarsal bone-current concepts revised].

S F Baumbach1, W C Prall2, M Braunstein1, W Böcker2, S Polzer3, H Polzer4.   

Abstract

Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone are one of the most frequent fractures to the foot and ankle. Despite the high frequency and although a number of studies are now available, treatment frequently does not follow the available evidence. Among the reasons is the inconsistent terminology used and that the studies available are neglected. The aim of this review is to present the current classifications, the available treatment studies and to derive evidence-based treatment recommendations. The term "Jones fracture" has been used inconsistently for different fracture entities and should, therefore, not be used anymore. Fractures are mostly classified according to Lawrence and Botte into three zones. However, the available studies demonstrate that type I and type II fractures according to Lawrence and Botte do not differ with respect to the prognosis. Both fractures can be successfully healed by functional treatment with weightbearing as tolerated. Consequently, a differentiation between these two zones does not seem to be meaningful. Therefore, they should be summarized as epi-metaphyseal fractures. Even dislocated, intra-articular, and multifragmentary fractures in this region can be functionally treated with good results. Fractures in the meta-diaphyseal region (Lawrence and Botte type III, distal to the IV and V intermetatarsal articulation) demonstrate a high rate of symptomatic non-unions after conservative treatment. Therefore, these fractures should be primarily treated operatively by closed reduction and intramedullary screw fixation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture fixation; Fractures, avulsion; Intramedullary, fracture, osteosynthesis; Metatarsus; Terminology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777283     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-018-0507-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  39 in total

1.  [Conservative therapy for metatarsal 5 basis fractures - retrospective and prospective analysis].

Authors:  S Schmoz; A L Voelcker; H Burchhardt; M Tezval; A Schleikis; K M Stürmer; S Sehmisch
Journal:  Sportverletz Sportschaden       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.077

2.  The intraosseous and extraosseous vascular supply of the fifth metatarsal: implications for fifth metatarsal osteotomy.

Authors:  Kathleen E McKeon; Jeffrey E Johnson; Jeremy J McCormick; Sandra E Klein
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Nonoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures in an orthopaedic suburban private multispeciality practice.

Authors:  Kurt F Konkel; Andrea G Menger; Sharon A Retzlaff
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Operative Treatment of Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fractures (Zones II and III) in the NBA.

Authors:  Martin O'Malley; Bridget DeSandis; Answorth Allen; Matthew Levitsky; Quinn O'Malley; Riley Williams
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Symptomatic treatment or cast immobilisation for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective, randomised, single-blinded non-inferiority controlled trial.

Authors:  P I Akimau; K L Cawthron; W M Dakin; C Chadwick; C M Blundell; M B Davies
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Fractures of the Proximal Fifth Metatarsal: Selecting the Best Treatment Option.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  A clinical and radiographic comparison of two hardware systems used to treat jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal.

Authors:  Joshua Metzl; Kirstina Olson; W Hodges Davis; Carroll Jones; Bruce Cohen; Robert Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal.

Authors:  Andrew C Gray; Brian P Rooney; Roland Ingram
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2008-05-19

9.  Aircast walking boot and below-knee walking cast for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammad Kamran Shahid; Shahid Punwar; Caroline Boulind; Gordon Bannister
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 10.  Jones' fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal.

Authors:  S J Lawrence; M J Botte
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug
View more
  5 in total

1.  [Metatarsal and toe fractures].

Authors:  M Beck; A Wichelhaus; R Rotter; P Gierer; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Incorrect aftercare of a surgically treated metatarsal fracture].

Authors:  M Zyskowski; M Wurm; T Neuhof
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Fifth Metatarsal Fracture–A Systematic Review of the Treatment of Fractures of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone.

Authors:  Viktoria Herterich; Sebastian Felix Baumbach; Antonia Kaiser; Wolfgang Böcker; Hans Polzer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Functional outcome of 103 fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone.

Authors:  Patrick Pflüger; Michael Zyskowski; Michael Müller; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Peter Biberthaler; Moritz Crönlein
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  [Functional outcome of 111 metatarsal fractures following conservative in comparison to operative treatment].

Authors:  Patrick Pflüger; Michael Zyskowski; Christopher Völk; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Peter Biberthaler; Moritz Crönlein
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.