Literature DB >> 1588863

Obstetric and birthweight differences between Vietnam-born and Australian-born women.

O A Henry1, R L Guaran, C D Petterson, J E Walstab.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the frequency of obstetrical complications and assess the outcome of pregnancies in Vietnam-born mothers; to compute birthweight percentile charts for their infants; and to compare these parameters in Vietnam-born women with those of a control group of Australian-born women.
DESIGN: A retrospective study of all pregnancies in Vietnam-born and Australian-born mothers managed in the Mercy Hospital for Women over a 10-year period, 1979-1988 inclusive.
SETTING: The Mercy Hospital for Women provides primary and secondary obstetric care to public and private patients. PATIENTS: All women born in Australia or Vietnam who delivered in the Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, over the 10-year period and their infants. Twins, stillborn babies and infants with congenital malformations were not included in the calculation of birthweight percentiles.
RESULTS: Gestational diabetes (7.3% v. 4.3%, P less than 0.0001) and low oestriol excretion (14.4% v. 10.8%, P less than 0.0001) were more common whereas essential hypertension (0.3% v. 1.2%, P less than 0.001) and pre eclampsia (3.7% v. 8.6%, P less than 0.0001) were less common among Vietnam-born mothers. Intervention for labour and delivery was less common among Vietnam-born mothers: induction of labour (7.1% v. 24.7%, P less than 0.0001) and forceps delivery (17.8% v. 21.9%, P less than 0.001); caesarean section rates were similar. Infants of Vietnam-born mothers were significantly lighter than those of Australian-born; percentile charts for birthweight and gestational age are presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancies among Vietnam-born women migrants in Australia were associated with few complications in spite of a higher incidence of gestational diabetes and a low oestriol excretion. The infants were lighter than those born to Australian-born mothers. Our percentile charts for birthweight relative to gestational age will provide a more accurate assessment of intrauterine growth for these infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1588863     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb139788.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

Review 1.  Birthweight, rapid growth, cancer, and longevity: a review.

Authors:  Thomas T Samaras; Harold Elrick; Lowell H Storms
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Morbidity risk at birth for Asian Indian small for gestational age infants.

Authors:  Henry Chong Lee; Pramela Ramachandran; Ashima Madan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Cord blood immune biomarkers in small for gestational age births.

Authors:  N Matoba; F Ouyang; K K L Mestan; N F M Porta; C M Pearson; K M Ortiz; H C Bauchner; B S Zuckerman; X Wang
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  International migration and caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Merry; Rhonda Small; Béatrice Blondel; Anita J Gagnon
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth.

Authors:  William J Kierans; K S Joseph; Zhong-Cheng Luo; Robert Platt; Russell Wilkins; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Perinatal Outcome in Women with a Vietnamese Migration Background - Retrospective Comparative Data Analysis of 3000 Deliveries.

Authors:  Nicole Boxall; Matthias David; Elisabeth Schalinski; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Oliver Razum; Lars Hellmeyer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.915

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.