Literature DB >> 15887218

Interobserver reliability of computed tomography-derived primary tumor volume measurement in patients with supraglottic carcinoma.

Suresh K Mukherji1, Alicia Y Toledano, Clifford Beldon, Ilona M Schmalfuss, Jay S Cooper, JoRean D Sicks, Robert Amdur, Scott Sailer, Laurie A Loevner, Phil Kousouboris, Kian Ang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have determined that macroscopic ("gross") tumor volume (GTV), as calculated from pretreatment computer tomography (CT), was capable of predicting local control in squamous cell carcinoma arising in different subsites in the head and neck in patients who were treated with nonsurgical organ-preservation therapy. The majority of these studies were single-institution, retrospective investigations. Consequently, there has been concern that GTV measurements may not be reproducible by different readers at different institutions. The objective of the current study was to measure the interobserver reliability for GTV measurements for squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx (SGSCCA) performed by different readers at different institutions.
METHODS: Eight experienced readers (4 neuroradiologists and 4 radiation oncologists) from different institutions independently measured the pretreatment GTV of 20 patients with SGSCCA. The CT scans were obtained from patients entered into the definitive radiation therapy arm of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 91-11, who had supraglottic carcinoma and underwent pretreatment CT scans of the neck. Statistical analysis focused on interobserver reliability as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.81 (95% lower confidence bound, 0.71). This value was interpreted as "excellent."
CONCLUSIONS: GTV measurements were reliable and reproducible when performed by neuroradiologists and radiation oncologists who were experienced in the interpretation of CT scans of the extracranial head and neck in patients with SGSCCA. The result implied that the correlation between GTV and local control should be reproducible across institutions. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15887218     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

1.  An evaluation of the variability of tumor-shape definition derived by experienced observers from CT images of supraglottic carcinomas (ACRIN protocol 6658).

Authors:  Jay S Cooper; Suresh K Mukherji; Alicia Y Toledano; Clifford Beldon; Ilona M Schmalfuss; Robert Amdur; Scott Sailer; Laurie A Loevner; Phil Kousouboris; K Kian Ang; Jean Cormack; JoRean Sicks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Treatment response assessment of head and neck cancers on CT using computerized volume analysis.

Authors:  L Hadjiiski; S K Mukherji; S K Gujar; B Sahiner; M Ibrahim; E Street; J Moyer; F P Worden; H-P Chan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability among Measurements of FDG PET/CT Parameters in Pulmonary Tumors.

Authors:  Gülgün Büyükdereli; Mehtap Güler; Gülşah Şeydaoğlu
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.021

4.  Oesophageal cancer: assessment of tumour response to chemoradiotherapy with tridimensional CT.

Authors:  Rita Alfieri; Giovanna Pintacuda; Matteo Cagol; Tommaso Occhipinti; Ivan Capraro; Marco Scarpa; Gianpietro Zanchettin; Francesco Cavallin; Mauro Michelotto; Luciano Giacomelli; Ermanno Ancona; Carlo Castoro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Head and neck cancers on CT: preliminary study of treatment response assessment based on computerized volume analysis.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Suresh K Mukherji; Mohannad Ibrahim; Berkman Sahiner; Sachin K Gujar; Jeffrey Moyer; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Importance of tumor volume in supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  L W van Bockel; E M Monninkhof; F A Pameijer; C H J Terhaard
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Imaging in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Zoran Rumboldt; Leonie Gordon; Leonie Gordon; Rick Bonsall; Susan Ackermann
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-01

8.  Metabolic tumor volume of primary tumor predicts survival better than T classification in the larynx preservation approach.

Authors:  Junji Miyabe; Atsushi Hanamoto; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Yukinori Takenaka; Susumu Nakahara; Toshihiro Kishikawa; Motoyuki Suzuki; Norihiko Takemoto; Takahiro Michiba; Yasuo Yoshioka; Fumiaki Isohashi; Koji Konishi; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Jun Hatazawa; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  Approximation of head and neck cancer volumes in contrast enhanced CT.

Authors:  D Dejaco; C Url; V H Schartinger; A K Haug; N Fischer; D Riedl; A Posch; H Riechelmann; G Widmann
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Tumor Volumes and Prognosis in Laryngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad R Issa; Stuart E Samuels; Emily Bellile; Firas L Shalabi; Avraham Eisbruch; Gregory Wolf
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.