Literature DB >> 15886046

Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy.

Daniel Abrams1, Megan Davidson, Julie Harrick, Peter Harcourt, Maria Zylinski, Jo Clancy.   

Abstract

Physiotherapists have traditionally relied on impairment measures such as range of motion and muscle strength to monitor patient progress. The impact of treatment on patients' daily activities can be assessed with valid and reliable questionnaires, but the use of standardized questionnaires by physiotherapists appeared to be limited. A range of strategies were implemented that aimed to increase physiotherapists' use of standardized measures of functional activities. A simple random sample of 300 was drawn from a database of physiotherapy providers to a transport accident scheme, and was surveyed in March and September 2003, with response rates of 51% and 55%, respectively. There was a statistically significant (P<.05) increase in reported use of seven questionnaires and a significant reduction in the perception of barriers that were targeted by the interventions The most frequently utilized tests were a pain rating scale and questionnaires for lumbar and cervical problems. Physiotherapists' attitudes to outcome measurement were generally positive although there was a small but statistically significant (P=.02) reduction in mean attitude score over the re-test period. Physiotherapists in the population sampled significantly increased their reported use of a range of standardized outcome measures over the re-test period. The trend towards greater objectivity in measuring the progress of rehabilitation can enable physiotherapists to develop improved treatment plans with the patients' needs at the centre of the equation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15886046     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2005.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  22 in total

1.  Prosthetists' perceptions and use of outcome measures in clinical practice: Long-term effects of focused continuing education.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Susan E Spaulding; Rana Salem; Sara J Morgan; Ignacio Gaunaurd; Robert Gailey
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale and Preliminary Testing of Short-Form Versions: A Calibration and Validation Study.

Authors:  Russell T Baker; Damon Burton; Michael A Pickering; Amanda Start
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  A survey of physical therapists' clinical practice patterns and adherence to clinical guidelines in the management of patients with whiplash associated disorders (WAD).

Authors:  Marie B Corkery; Kristen L Edgar; Christine E Smith
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-05

4.  Reduced version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) for inpatients, "6-clicks": Brazilian-Portuguese cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties.

Authors:  Pollyana Ruggio Tristão Borges; Rosana Ferreira Sampaio; Renata Noce Kirkwood; Mariana Angélica Peixoto de Souza; Marisa Cotta Mancini; Sheyla Rossana Cavalcanti Furtado
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  The use of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale to measure rehabilitative progress in a physiotherapy setting.

Authors:  Paul Nicholas; Cheryl Hefford; Steve Tumilty
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

6.  Interpreting Action Research Arm Test Assessment Scores to Plan Treatment.

Authors:  Emily S Grattan; Craig A Velozo; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Stephen J Page; Michelle L Woodbury
Journal:  OTJR (Thorofare N J)       Date:  2018-02-15

7.  A Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults With Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moore; Kirsten Potter; Kathleen Blankshain; Sandra L Kaplan; Linda C OʼDwyer; Jane E Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Benefits of and barriers to using patient-rated outcome measures in athletic training.

Authors:  Alison R Snyder Valier; Amy L Jennings; John T Parsons; Luzita I Vela
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Using Outcome Measures in Daily Practice: Development and Evaluation of an Implementation Strategy for Physiotherapists in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Raymond A H M Swinkels; Guus M Meerhoff; Jan W H Custers; Roland P S van Peppen; Anna J H M Beurskens; Harriet Wittink
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

10.  Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Christopher G Maher; Grant Mackay
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.