Literature DB >> 15885859

Scapular kinematics during humeral elevation in adults and children.

Sudarshan Dayanidhi1, Margo Orlin, Scott Kozin, Susan Duff, Andrew Karduna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate motion of the scapula is important for dynamic positioning of the glenoid during humeral elevation. A number of studies have described the typical scapular kinematics during humeral elevation in adults. However, children and adults may have differences in scapulothoracic musculature and scapular osteology. To our knowledge, no study has been performed examining scapular kinematics in children with either typical or atypical development. Consequently in children the influence of age and development on scapular motion is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the kinematic patterns of the scapula during humeral elevation in children with typical development and healthy adults.
METHODS: Fifteen adults, 7 females, 25-37 years of age, and 14 children, 8 females, 4-9 years of age, participated in this study. Kinematic data were collected using a magnetic tracking device. Subjects were asked to elevate their arm in the scapular plane (40 degrees anterior to the frontal plane) in a sequence of three trials.
FINDINGS: Significant differences were seen between the two age groups in the dependent variables. During scapular plane rotation from 25 degrees to 125 degrees , children showed greater upward rotation (43.9 degrees SD 6.39 degrees ) than adults (29.1 degrees SD 10.1 degrees ). The mean glenohumeral to scapulothoracic ratio in the scapular plane was 2.4:1 for adults, 1.3:1 for children.
INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates that there are significant differences in scapular kinematic patterns between children and adults. Children have a greater contribution from the scapulothoracic joint, specifically upward rotation toward humeral elevation. From a clinical perspective, these results can be used to help determine the incorporation of stabilization and mobilization of the scapulothoracic joint during exercises for a child with impairment at the shoulder for improving shoulder function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15885859     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  14 in total

1.  Adaptive Alterations in Shoulder Range of Motion and Strength in Young Tennis Players.

Authors:  Benoit Gillet; Mickaël Begon; Violaine Sevrez; Christian Berger-Vachon; Isabelle Rogowski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Scapular positioning in athlete's shoulder : particularities, clinical measurements and implications.

Authors:  Bénédicte Forthomme; Jean-Michel Crielaard; Jean-Louis Croisier
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  In vivo kinematic analysis of the glenohumeral joint during dynamic full axial rotation and scapular plane full abduction in healthy shoulders.

Authors:  Naoya Kozono; Takamitsu Okada; Naohide Takeuchi; Satoshi Hamai; Hidehiko Higaki; Satoru Ikebe; Takeshi Shimoto; Go Miake; Yoshitaka Nakanishi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Biomechanical contributions of posterior deltoid and teres minor in the context of axillary nerve injury: a computational study.

Authors:  Dustin L Crouch; Johannes F Plate; Zhongyu Li; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Inter-examiner reproducibility of clinical tests and criteria used to identify subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Mikkel Vind; Søren Bie Bogh; Camilla Marie Larsen; Hans Kromann Knudsen; Karen Søgaard; Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Effects of sex differences on scapular motion during arm elevation.

Authors:  Takashi Nagamatsu; Yoshihiro Kai; Masafumi Gotoh; Kazuya Madokoro; Naoto Shiba
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2015-06-08

7.  Does Scapular Motion Regress with Aging and is It Restricted in Patients with Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder?

Authors:  Kazuhiro Endo; Junichiro Hamada; Kazuaki Suzuki; Yoshihiro Hagiwara; Takayuki Muraki; Hiroshi Karasuno
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-04-06

8.  Effect of external load on scapular upward rotation during arm elevation: the knot concept.

Authors:  Kazuya Madokoro; Masafumi Gotoh; Yoshihiro Kai; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Takashi Nagamatsu; Naoto Shiba
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-02-03

9.  A comparison of 3D scapular kinematics between dominant and nondominant shoulders during multiplanar arm motion.

Authors:  Sang Ki Lee; Dae Suk Yang; Ha Yong Kim; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Dynamic scapular movement analysis: is it feasible and reliable in stroke patients during arm elevation?

Authors:  Liesbet De Baets; Sara Van Deun; Kaat Desloovere; Ellen Jaspers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.