Literature DB >> 15885576

PSA elevation during prostate cryosurgery and subsequent decline.

Dan Leibovici1, Amnon Zisman, Arie Lindner, Kobi Stav, Yoram I Siegel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the immediate effect of prostate cryosurgery on PSA and the subsequent decline. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PSA level was measured in 14 patients who underwent cryosurgery for prostate cancer. Blood samples were taken immediately before and after cryosurgery and 1, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. A confidence interval for the elevation from baseline to maximal PSA was calculated. PSA decline was assessed in patients with a nadir PSA < or =0.5 ng/mL. Patients with a postoperative nadir PSA >0.5 ng/mL were considered to harbor viable cancer and were excluded from the decline analysis. The observed PSA levels during the postoperative period were compared with the expected levels that were calculated according to the maximal PSA level and a serum half-life of 2.5 days. Student t-test was used to compare expected and observed PSA levels.
RESULTS: PSA increased from an average of 9.23 ng/mL preoperatively to a maximum average of 155 ng/mL (maximal PSA ranges: 18.9-490.5 ng/mL). The 95% CI for the increase in PSA from baseline level was 63.4 to 224.14. PSA nadir < or =0.5 ng/mL was achieved in 10 patients. The observed PSA decline course was slower than expected according to its half-life. Average observed and expected PSA levels at 2,4 and 6 weeks after cryosurgery were 10.4 versus 3.57 ng/mL (P = 0.005), 0.65 versus 0.07 (P = 0.007) and 0.09 versus 0.001 (P = 0.03), respectively.
CONCLUSION: PSA levels increase steeply following cryosurgery, and decline slower than expected according to the serum half-life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15885576     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2004.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  6 in total

1.  MR imaging-guided cryoablation for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Pejman Ghanouni; Harcharan Gill; Elena Kaye; Kim Butts Pauly; Bruce Daniel
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 2.  MR imaging of treated prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Cecilia Wassberg; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Motexafin lutetium-photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer: short- and long-term effects on prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Hiral Patel; Rosemarie Mick; Jarod Finlay; Timothy C Zhu; Elizabeth Rickter; Keith A Cengel; S Bruce Malkowicz; Stephen M Hahn; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Hyperthermia combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors.

Authors:  Ximing Yang; Miaozhi Gao; Runshi Xu; Yangyang Tao; Wang Luo; Binya Wang; Wenliang Zhong; Lan He; Yingchun He
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 5.  Thermal ablation in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of treatment modalities and the evidence for combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Kanishka Rangamuwa; Tracy Leong; Clare Weeden; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Steven Bozinovski; Michael Christie; Tom John; Phillip Antippa; Louis Irving; Daniel Steinfort
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06

Review 6.  Photosensitizers in prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Taher Gheewala; Troy Skwor; Gnanasekar Munirathinam
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.