Literature DB >> 1588436

Interphase cytogenetics: a new tool for the study of genetic changes in brain tumors.

E P Arnoldus1, L B Wolters, J H Voormolen, S G van Duinen, A K Raap, M van der Ploeg, A C Peters.   

Abstract

Interphase cytogenetics is the application of nonradioactive in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes to interphase nuclei. In this study, interphase cytogenetics was used to investigate 66 primary brain tumors (33 gliomas, 30 meningiomas, and three medulloblastomas) for numerical chromosomal aberrations of chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 10, 11, 17, 18, X, and Y. Of the 33 gliomas (17 astrocytomas grades II, III, and IV, five oligoastrocytomas, seven oligodendrogliomas, and four ependymal tumors), 22 were near diploid, while the remaining 11 showed a significant triploid or tetraploid component. The predominant specific aberrations in gliomas were an over-representation of chromosome 7 (13 cases) and an under-representation of chromosome 10 (16 cases). These changes were observed in grade III and grade IV astrocytomas, as well as in oligodendrogliomas. Other frequent numerical changes were a gain of chromosome 17 (six cases) and a loss of chromosome 18 (seven cases). This loss of chromosome 18 seemed relatively specific for gliomas with an oligodendroglial component (six cases). Only two of 33 gliomas displayed no genetic abnormality with the probes used. Seven patients with astrocytomas died of their brain tumor during the clinical follow-up period. Their astrocytomas did not show a different chromosomal constitution compared to the other gliomas. For the meningiomas, the probe panel was extended with a probe specific for chromosome 22. Loss of chromosome 22 was obvious in 21 of the 30 meningiomas, and was the sole abnormality in 11 meningiomas; in the other 10, this loss was associated with other chromosomal changes. Five of these tumors with additional aberrations were recurrent or atypical meningiomas. It is suggested that interphase cytogenetics can contribute to a better understanding of the biological behavior of these tumors and possibly result in better insights into prognosis and strategies for therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1588436     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1992.76.6.0997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

1.  Hyperdiploidy defines a distinct cytogenetic entity of meningiomas.

Authors:  Ralf Ketter; Yoo-Jin Kim; Simone Storck; Jörg Rahnenführer; Bernd F M Romeike; Wolf-Ingo Steudel; Klaus D Zang; Wolfram Henn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Analysis of chromosome 7 in adult and pediatric ependymomas using chromogenic in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Mariarita Santi; Martha Quezado; Rubin Ronchetti; Elisabeth J Rushing
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Investigation of genetic alterations associated with development and adverse outcome in patients with astrocytic tumor.

Authors:  A M Cianciulli; E Morace; A M Coletta; E Occhipinti; G M Gandolfo; G Leonardo; C M Carapella
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Products of cells from gliomas: IX. Evidence that two fundamentally different mechanisms change extracellular matrix expression by gliomas.

Authors:  P E McKeever; J Varani; S M Papadopoulos; M Wang; J P McCoy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Genetics of primary brain tumors: a review.

Authors:  M Bondy; J Wiencke; M Wrensch; A P Kyritsis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Interphase cytogenetics of glioblastoma and gliosarcoma.

Authors:  W Paulus; A Bayas; G Ott; W Roggendorf
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.088

7.  Deletions in the 17q chromosomal region and their influence on the clonal cytogenetic evolution of recurrent meningiomas.

Authors:  Sina Hemmer; Steffi Urbschat; Joachim Oertel; Ralf Ketter
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Proliferation and aneusomy predict survival of young patients with astrocytoma grade II.

Authors:  P H Wessels; A H N Hopman; B Kubat; A G H Kessels; E W Hoving; M I J Ummelen; F C S Ramaekers; A Twijnstra
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.