| Literature DB >> 12838313 |
P H Wessels1, A H N Hopman, B Kubat, A G H Kessels, E W Hoving, M I J Ummelen, F C S Ramaekers, A Twijnstra.
Abstract
The clinical course of astrocytoma grade II (AII) is highly variable and not reflected by histological characteristics. As one of the best prognostic factors, higher age identifies rapid progressive A II. For patients over 35 years of age, an aggressive treatment is normally propagated. For patients under 35 years, there is no clear guidance for treatment choices, and therefore also the necessity of histopathological diagnosis is often questioned. We studied the additional prognostic value of the proliferation index and the detection of genetic aberrations for patients with A II. The tumour samples were obtained by stereotactic biopsy or tumour resection and divided into two age groups, that is 18-34 years (n=19) and > or =35 years (n=28). Factors tested included the proliferation (Ki-67) index, and numerical aberrations for chromosomes 1, 7, and 10, as detected by in situ hybridisation (ISH). The results show that age is a prognostic indicator when studied in the total patient group, with patients above 35 years showing a relatively poor prognosis. Increased proliferation index in the presence of aneusomy appears to identify a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis more accurately than predicted by proliferation index alone. We conclude that histologically classified cases of A II comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours with different biological and genetic constitution, which exhibit a highly variable clinical course. Immunostaining for Ki-67 in combination with the detection of aneusomy by ISH allows the identification of a subgroup of patients with rapidly progressive A II. This is an extra argument not to defer stereotactic biopsy in young patients with radiological suspicion of A II.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12838313 PMCID: PMC2394227 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Association between patient age (18–34 vs ⩾35 years) and survival in A II. Kaplan–Meier, P-value = 0.05, log-rank. ·········· 18–34 years (n=19). ——— ⩾35 years (n=28).
Unfavourable prognostic factors for patients with astrocytoma grade II
| Proliferation index >1% ( | 3.63 (1.22–10.82) | 0.02 |
| Focal neurological deficit ( | 2.78 (1.12–6.90) | 0.03 |
| Aneusomy ( | 3.29 (0.97–11.20) | 0.06 |
| Patient age ⩾35 years ( | 2.52 (0.97–6.58) | 0.06 |
| Proliferation index >1% (n=29) | 4.81 (1.50–15.38) | 0.01 |
| Patient age ⩾35 years ( | 3.01 (1.13–7.99) | 0.03 |
| Aneusomy ( | 3.66 (1.06–12.62) | 0.04 |
CI=confidence interval.
Figure 2High proliferation (Ki-67) index in A II is associated with shorter survival in (A) patients aged 18–34 (P-value=0.02) and (B) patients ⩾35 years (P-value=0.03). Kaplan–Meier; pooled log-rank test, P-value=0.002. ·········· Proliferation index ⩽1% (n=18). —— Proliferation index >1% (n=29).
Figure 3Relation of aneusomy with shorter survival in (A) A II patients aged 18–34 (P-value=0.36) and (B) patients ⩾35 years (P-value=0.09). Kaplan–Meier; pooled log-rank test, P=0.05. ·········· Disomy (n=15). —— Aneusomy (n=32).
Figure 4The combination of both high proliferation (Ki-67) index and aneusomy is strongly associated with a shorter survival in A II patients (A) aged 18–34 (P=0.01) and (B) aged ⩾35 years (P=0.001). Kaplan–Meier; pooled log-rank test, P<0.0001.·········· Proliferation index ⩽1% or Disomy (n=26). —— Proliferation index >1% and Aneusomy (n=21).
Figure 5Astocytoma grade II in a patient aged 25 years with a high proliferation (Ki-67) index (A), and frequent nuclei with trisomy for chromosome 7, detected by ISH (B). Counter-staining with DAPI in (B). Magnifications × 800.