PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of procedures developed to increase cornea donation in a general hospital. Comparative study before and after intervention. Since february 2002 all cases of intra-hospital death were considered by the hospital coordinator. A written selection protocol for potential donors was adopted and telephone interviews to obtain family consent were conducted using a standardized procedure. METHODS: The number of deaths in the institution, deaths considered by the hospital coordinator, clinical contraindications to harvesting, potential donors, face-to-face interview and telephone contact with families, the donation acceptance rate during telephone and face-to-face interviews, and the number of donors and corneas actually collected were recorded before and after intervention. The data were analyzed during two consecutive periods: Period 1, february 2001 to january 2002 (before protocol), and period 2, february 2002 to january 2003 (after protocol). RESULTS: The number of deaths in the institution was similar for the two periods. The increase in deaths considered by the hospital coordinator and the decrease in contraindications resulted from increasing the pool of potential donors from 188 to 401 (p < 0.001). The number of telephone interviews increased from 33 to 274. The rate of family consent given during face-to-face interviews was similar, 61% versus 72% (p = 0.1), but acceptance during telephone interviews increased from 15% to 60% (p < 0.001) and 138 corneas were collected in period 1 and 443 in period 2. The rate of cornea donors increased from 6% to 20% of the hospital's deaths. CONCLUSION: The consideration of all hospital deaths, the use of a written protocol of contraindications for cornea donation and the wide use of telephone interviews to obtain family consent led to a dramatic increase in cornea donation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of procedures developed to increase cornea donation in a general hospital. Comparative study before and after intervention. Since february 2002 all cases of intra-hospital death were considered by the hospital coordinator. A written selection protocol for potential donors was adopted and telephone interviews to obtain family consent were conducted using a standardized procedure. METHODS: The number of deaths in the institution, deaths considered by the hospital coordinator, clinical contraindications to harvesting, potential donors, face-to-face interview and telephone contact with families, the donation acceptance rate during telephone and face-to-face interviews, and the number of donors and corneas actually collected were recorded before and after intervention. The data were analyzed during two consecutive periods: Period 1, february 2001 to january 2002 (before protocol), and period 2, february 2002 to january 2003 (after protocol). RESULTS: The number of deaths in the institution was similar for the two periods. The increase in deaths considered by the hospital coordinator and the decrease in contraindications resulted from increasing the pool of potential donors from 188 to 401 (p < 0.001). The number of telephone interviews increased from 33 to 274. The rate of family consent given during face-to-face interviews was similar, 61% versus 72% (p = 0.1), but acceptance during telephone interviews increased from 15% to 60% (p < 0.001) and 138 corneas were collected in period 1 and 443 in period 2. The rate of cornea donors increased from 6% to 20% of the hospital's deaths. CONCLUSION: The consideration of all hospital deaths, the use of a written protocol of contraindications for cornea donation and the wide use of telephone interviews to obtain family consent led to a dramatic increase in cornea donation.