Literature DB >> 15883136

Can poorly performing doctors blame their assessment tools?

Richard Baker1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 15883136      PMCID： PMC558097          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.38469.406597.0B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  When enough is enough: a conceptual basis for fair and defensible practice performance assessment.

Authors:  L W T Schuwirth; L Southgate; G G Page; N S Paget; J M J Lescop; S R Lew; W B Wade; M Barón-Maldonado
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joan M Sargeant; Karen V Mann; Suzanne N Ferrier; Donald B Langille; Philip D Muirhead; Vonda M Hayes; Douglas E Sinclair
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians.

Authors:  Richard Evans; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-22

4.  Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training.

Authors:  Julian C Archer; John Norcini; Helena A Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-09

5.  The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.

Authors:  C P Van Der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.853
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Experiencing patient-experience surveys: a qualitative study of the accounts of GPs.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Richard Evans; Paul White; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.386
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.