Literature DB >> 14557092

Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study.

Joan M Sargeant1, Karen V Mann, Suzanne N Ferrier, Donald B Langille, Philip D Muirhead, Vonda M Hayes, Douglas E Sinclair.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe responses of family physicians, their medical colleagues, and coworker raters to a multisource feedback assessment process.
METHOD: Data collection tools included multisource feedback self-assessment and medical colleague, coworker, and patient rating forms; and program evaluation physician and rater questionnaires.
RESULTS: The pilot study included 142 physicians and their raters, with 113 (80%) physicians completing evaluations. Positive correlations were found between familiarity scores and medical colleague and coworker mean ratings. Peer medical colleagues were significantly more familiar with physicians than were consultants. Consultants were unable to rate items most frequently. Physicians disagreed with colleague feedback more frequently. Agreement was positively correlated with scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Familiarity, ability to observe physicians appropriately to rate them, and physicians' responses to feedback are factors to consider when multisource feedback is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557092     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  15 in total

1.  Can poorly performing doctors blame their assessment tools?

Authors:  Richard Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-09

2.  Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Hill; Anthea Asprey; Suzanne H Richards; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Patient feedback on hospital pharmacists' consultation skills: A feasibility study using the Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire (ISQ).

Authors:  Hiyam Al-Jabr; Michael J Twigg; Thando Katangwe-Chigamba; Robin Saadvandi; James A Desborough
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Factors predicting doctors' reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback.

Authors:  Karlijn Overeem; Hub C Wollersheimh; Onyebuchi A Arah; Juliette K Cruijsberg; Richard Ptm Grol; Kiki Mjmh Lombarts
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Miller; Julian Archer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-24

6.  Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.

Authors:  John L Campbell; Martin Roberts; Christine Wright; Jacqueline Hill; Michael Greco; Matthew Taylor; Suzanne Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-27

7.  Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.

Authors:  Karlijn Overeem; Hub C Wollersheim; Onyebuchi A Arah; Juliette K Cruijsberg; Richard P T M Grol; Kiki M J M H Lombarts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Utility of 360-degree assessment of residents in a Turkish academic emergency medicine residency program.

Authors:  Cem Oktay; Yesim Senol; Stephan Rinnert; Yildiray Cete
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-27

9.  Developing and Implementing a Multisource Feedback Tool to Assess Competencies of Emergency Medicine Residents in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph LaMantia; Lalena M Yarris; Kharmene Sunga; Moshe Weizberg; Danielle Hart; Gino Farina; Elliot Rodriguez; Raymond Lucas; Zayan Mahmooth; Alexandra Snock; Jocelyn Lockyear
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 10.  Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Ferguson; Judy Wakeling; Paul Bowie
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.