Literature DB >> 15880410

Treatment results of 1070 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of survival and failure patterns.

To-Wai Leung1, Stewart Yuk Tung, Wing-Kin Sze, Frank Chi-Shing Wong, Kwok-Keung Yuen, Collin Ming-Ming Lui, Sing-Hung Lo, Ting-Ying Ng, Sai-Ki O.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated primarily by external beam irradiation (ERT) and to explore for possible ways to improve the treatment results.
METHODS: One thousand seventy patients with nonmetastatic NPC treated from 1990 to 1998 were retrospectively analyzed. The distribution according to the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) (1997 edition) staging system at initial diagnosis was as follows: stage I, n = 113; stage IIA, n = 38; stage IIB, n = 360; stage III, n = 306; stage IVA, n = 136; stage IVB, n = 117; T1, n = 284; T2a, n = 88; T2b, n = 398; T3, n = 149; T4, n = 151; N0, n = 321; N1, n = 393; N2, n = 238; N3a, n = 29; N3b, n = 89. Two hundred eight patients were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ninety-seven patients were diagnosed with locally persistent disease and were salvaged with high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy. Multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox regression proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial local failure-free survival, regional failure-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 80.9%, 93.3%, 77.2%, 62.7%, 71.4%, and 66.5%, respectively. Isolated distant metastasis occurred in 191 patients (18%). The distributions were as follow: stage I, 2.1% (two of 95); stage IIA, 5.7% (two of 35); stage IIB, 14.9% (45 of 302); stage III, 26.4% (62 of 235); stage IVA, 40% (40 of 100); stage IVB, 47.1% (40 of 85). Results of the multivariate analysis of various clinical endpoints were discussed. By studying these failure patterns, it is hoped that we could refine future treatments according to the failure patterns of patients with different risks of locoregional and distant failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The 18% incidence of isolated distant metastasis is too high to be ignored. Maximizing the local control and minimizing the risk of distant metastasis and late complications should be the key objectives in designing future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15880410     DOI: 10.1002/hed.20189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  58 in total

1.  Anatomy Relationship around Internal Carotid Artery in the Endoscopic Surgery of Nasopharynx: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Zhen Gao; Fang-Lu Chi
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-12-24

2.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: relationship between invasion of the prevertebral space and distant metastases.

Authors:  Qi-Yong Ai; Chen-Wen Hu; Kunwar S Bhatia; Darren M C Poon; Edwin P Hui; Frankie K F Mo; Benjamin King Hong Law; Macy Tong; Brigette B Ma; Anthony T C Chan; Ann D King
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Nasopharyngeal mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Javier Martínez Ollero; Asunción Hervás Morón; Angel Montero Luis; Soraya Marcos Sánchez; Andrea Abondano Nazarewsky; Ma José Salgueiro López; Alfredo Ramos Aguerri
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-11-20

4.  N,N'-dinitrosopiperazine-mediated ezrin protein phosphorylation via activation of Rho kinase and protein kinase C is involved in metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma 6-10B cells.

Authors:  Faqing Tang; Feiyan Zou; Zhengke Peng; Damao Huang; Yuan Wu; Yu Chen; Chaojun Duan; Ya Cao; Wenhua Mei; Xiaowei Tang; Zigang Dong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A benchmark study on 883 nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated in two Italian centres from 1977 to 2000. Part I: Evolving technical choices and survival.

Authors:  S Tonoli; S M Magrini; L Costa; F Paiar; G Simontacchi; V Scotti; N Pasinetti; R Barca; D Barbieri; A De Stefani; E Cellai; M Buglione; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Diagnostic value of serum M30 and M65 in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Fatma Sen; Ibrahim Yildiz; Hatice Odabas; Makbule Tambas; Leyla Kilic; Ahmet Karadeniz; Musa Altun; Meltem Ekenel; Murat Serilmez; Derya Duranyildiz; Sevil Bavbek; Mert Basaran
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-18

7.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 overexpression is mostly independent of gene amplification and constitutes an independent prognosticator for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tzu-Ju Chen; Sung-Wei Lee; Li-Ching Lin; Ching-Yih Lin; Kwang-Yu Chang; Chien-Feng Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-27

8.  Berberine inhibits metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma 5-8F cells by targeting Rho kinase-mediated Ezrin phosphorylation at threonine 567.

Authors:  Faqing Tang; Dongsheng Wang; Chaojun Duan; Damao Huang; Yuan Wu; Yu Chen; Weiwei Wang; Chunlei Xie; Jingjing Meng; Lei Wang; Bin Wu; Shujin Liu; Daofa Tian; Feng Zhu; Zhiwei He; Fuliang Deng; Ya Cao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Review of photon and proton radiotherapy for skull base tumours.

Authors:  Piero Fossati; Andrea Vavassori; Letizia Deantonio; Eleonora Ferrara; Marco Krengli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-04-16

10.  Comparison of single versus fractionated dose of stereotactic radiotherapy for salvaging local failures of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a matched-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Daniel T T Chua; Shao-Xiong Wu; Victor Lee; Janice Tsang
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.