J Francis1, W N Kapoor. 1. Section of Geriatrics and Extended Care, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine survival, functional independence, and cognitive performance of older patients 2 years after an episode of delirium. DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study. SETTING: General medical wards of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients aged 70 years or older who had been community-dwelling prior to admission. Fifty patients met criteria for delirium (cases); these were compared to patients without delirium (controls). Two-hundred twenty-three patients survived hospitalization (46 cases, 177 controls) Of these, 92% were followed greater than or equal to 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vital status, place of residence, activities of daily living (ADL), and cognitive performance were determined by telephone interview of patients or care-givers 2 years after discharge. Independent community living was defined as survivorship outside of an institution and without dependence in any of four basic ADL (bathing, dressing, transfers, eating). RESULTS: Two-year mortality in the entire population was 39% for cases and 23% for controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.19). Delirium identified those patients at risk for loss of independent community living, even after adjustment for potential confounding variables (adjusted odds ratio 2.56, 95% confidence interval 1.10-5.91). Follow-up cognitive testing in a subset of patients with high baseline performance revealed a greater decline in performance among cases of delirium than controls (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium identifies older patients at risk for mortality or loss of independence. Delirium may also identify patients at risk for future cognitive decline.
OBJECTIVE: To determine survival, functional independence, and cognitive performance of older patients 2 years after an episode of delirium. DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study. SETTING: General medical wards of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients aged 70 years or older who had been community-dwelling prior to admission. Fifty patients met criteria for delirium (cases); these were compared to patients without delirium (controls). Two-hundred twenty-three patients survived hospitalization (46 cases, 177 controls) Of these, 92% were followed greater than or equal to 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vital status, place of residence, activities of daily living (ADL), and cognitive performance were determined by telephone interview of patients or care-givers 2 years after discharge. Independent community living was defined as survivorship outside of an institution and without dependence in any of four basic ADL (bathing, dressing, transfers, eating). RESULTS: Two-year mortality in the entire population was 39% for cases and 23% for controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.19). Delirium identified those patients at risk for loss of independent community living, even after adjustment for potential confounding variables (adjusted odds ratio 2.56, 95% confidence interval 1.10-5.91). Follow-up cognitive testing in a subset of patients with high baseline performance revealed a greater decline in performance among cases of delirium than controls (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS:Delirium identifies older patients at risk for mortality or loss of independence. Delirium may also identify patients at risk for future cognitive decline.
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Karen B Hirschman; Kathryn H Bowles; M Brian Bixby; JoAnne Konick-McMahan; Caroline Stephens Journal: Home Health Care Serv Q Date: 2007
Authors: Holly Gil; Ashley A Tuttle; Laura A Dean; David A Johnson; David Portelli; Janette Baird; Neha P Raukar Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2019-10-15
Authors: Timothy D Girard; James C Jackson; Pratik P Pandharipande; Brenda T Pun; Jennifer L Thompson; Ayumi K Shintani; Sharon M Gordon; Angelo E Canonico; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Inge A P Smeets; Eva Y L Tan; Helen G M Vossen; Piet L J M Leroy; Richel H B Lousberg; Jim van Os; Jan N M Schieveld Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-09-27 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Dan K Kiely; Edward R Marcantonio; Sharon K Inouye; Michele L Shaffer; Margaret A Bergmann; Frances M Yang; Michael A Fearing; Richard N Jones Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: A Morandi; P Pandharipande; M Trabucchi; R Rozzini; G Mistraletti; A C Trompeo; C Gregoretti; L Gattinoni; M V Ranieri; L Brochard; D Annane; C Putensen; U Guenther; P Fuentes; E Tobar; A R Anzueto; A Esteban; Y Skrobik; J I F Salluh; M Soares; C Granja; A Stubhaug; S E de Rooij; E Wesley Ely Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: James C Root; Kane O Pryor; Robert Downey; Yesne Alici; Marcus L Davis; Andrei Holodny; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Tim Ahles Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 3.894