OBJECTIVE: Post-operative delirium is associated with pre-operative cognitive difficulties and diminished functional independence, both of which suggest that brain pathology may be present in affected individuals prior to surgery. Currently, there are few studies that have examined imaging correlates of post-operative delirium. To our knowledge, none have examined the association of delirium with existing structural pathology in pre-operative cancer patients. Here, we present a novel, retrospective strategy to assess pre-operative structural brain pathology and its association with post-operative delirium. Standard of care structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) from a cohort of surgical candidates prior to surgery were analyzed for white matter hyperintensities and cerebral atrophy. METHODS: We identified 23 non-small cell lung cancer patients with no evidence of metastases in the brain pre-operatively, through retrospective chart review, who met criteria for post-operative delirium within 4 days of surgery. 24 age- and gender-matched control subjects were identified for comparison to the delirium sample. T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences were collected from standard of care pre-operative MRI screening and assessed for white matter pathology and atrophy. RESULTS: We found significant differences in white matter pathology between groups with the delirium group exhibiting significantly greater white matter pathology than the non-delirium group. Measure of cerebral atrophy demonstrated no significant difference between the delirium and non-delirium group. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study utilizing standard of care pre-operative brain MRIs for assessment of structural risk factors to delirium, we found white matter pathology to be a significant risk factor in post-operative delirium. Limitations and implications for further investigation are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: Post-operative delirium is associated with pre-operative cognitive difficulties and diminished functional independence, both of which suggest that brain pathology may be present in affected individuals prior to surgery. Currently, there are few studies that have examined imaging correlates of post-operative delirium. To our knowledge, none have examined the association of delirium with existing structural pathology in pre-operative cancerpatients. Here, we present a novel, retrospective strategy to assess pre-operative structural brain pathology and its association with post-operative delirium. Standard of care structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) from a cohort of surgical candidates prior to surgery were analyzed for white matter hyperintensities and cerebral atrophy. METHODS: We identified 23 non-small cell lung cancerpatients with no evidence of metastases in the brain pre-operatively, through retrospective chart review, who met criteria for post-operative delirium within 4 days of surgery. 24 age- and gender-matched control subjects were identified for comparison to the delirium sample. T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences were collected from standard of care pre-operative MRI screening and assessed for white matter pathology and atrophy. RESULTS: We found significant differences in white matter pathology between groups with the delirium group exhibiting significantly greater white matter pathology than the non-delirium group. Measure of cerebral atrophy demonstrated no significant difference between the delirium and non-delirium group. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study utilizing standard of care pre-operative brain MRIs for assessment of structural risk factors to delirium, we found white matter pathology to be a significant risk factor in post-operative delirium. Limitations and implications for further investigation are discussed.
Authors: David C Alsop; Michael A Fearing; Keith Johnson; Reisa Sperling; Tamara G Fong; Sharon K Inouye Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Irene B Meier; Jennifer J Manly; Frank A Provenzano; Karmen S Louie; Ben T Wasserman; Erica Y Griffith; Josina T Hector; Elizabeth Allocco; Adam M Brickman Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Frank Schneider; Hinrich Böhner; Ute Habel; Jasmin B Salloum; Anselm Stierstorfer; Thomas C Hummel; Caeser Miller; Ralf Friedrichs; Eckhard E Müller; Wilhelm Sandmann Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Carol Murray; David J Sanderson; Chris Barkus; Robert M J Deacon; J Nicholas P Rawlins; David M Bannerman; Colm Cunningham Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Michele Cavallari; Weiying Dai; Charles R G Guttmann; Dominik S Meier; Long H Ngo; Tammy T Hshieh; Amy E Callahan; Tamara G Fong; Eva Schmitt; Bradford C Dickerson; Daniel Z Press; Edward R Marcantonio; Richard N Jones; Sharon K Inouye; David C Alsop Journal: Brain Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Michele Cavallari; Tammy T Hshieh; Charles R G Guttmann; Long H Ngo; Dominik S Meier; Eva M Schmitt; Edward R Marcantonio; Richard N Jones; Cyrus M Kosar; Tamara G Fong; Daniel Press; Sharon K Inouye; David C Alsop Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Tammy T Hshieh; Weiying Dai; Michele Cavallari; Charles Rg Guttmann; Dominik S Meier; Eva M Schmitt; Bradford C Dickerson; Daniel Z Press; Edward R Marcantonio; Richard N Jones; Yun Ray Gou; Thomas G Travison; Tamara G Fong; Long Ngo; Sharon K Inouye; David C Alsop Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Annie M Racine; Tamara G Fong; Thomas G Travison; Richard N Jones; Yun Gou; Sarinnapha M Vasunilashorn; Edward R Marcantonio; David C Alsop; Sharon K Inouye; Bradford C Dickerson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Charles H Brown; Roland Faigle; Lauren Klinker; Mona Bahouth; Laura Max; Andrew LaFlam; Karin J Neufeld; Kaushik Mandal; Rebecca F Gottesman; Charles W Hogue Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2015-11-29 Impact factor: 3.393