Literature DB >> 1587966

No influence of single intravenous doses of omeprazole on theophylline elimination kinetics.

B Oosterhuis1, J H Jonkman, T Andersson, P B Zuiderwijk.   

Abstract

The influence of single intravenous doses of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered theophylline was studied in eight healthy male volunteers. In a partially randomized three-period crossover design, an IV infusion of theophylline (400 mg over 30 min) was combined with IV omeprazole (either 40 mg over 2.5 min or 80 mg over 5 min) or with IV placebo (over 2.5 min). Theophylline and omeprazole plasma concentrations were measured over 24 hours after the start of the infusions and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. The theophylline plasma concentration-time profiles after omeprazole coadministration were virtually identical to the corresponding profile after placebo administration. For each of the pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, the 90% confidence intervals of the omeprazole coadministrations were within the 80 to 120% bioequivalence range with respect to the placebo coadministration. Omeprazole plasma concentrations indicated a biexponential decline in most subjects, with a more rapid elimination after the 40-mg than after the 80-mg dose (P less than .01). Doubling the dose caused an almost three-fold increase of AUC resulting in a difference in clearance (P less than .02), whereas the volume of distribution was similar. The results of this study indicate that the metabolism of theophylline is not affected by single intravenous doses of omeprazole. The nonlinear pharmacokinetics of omeprazole are ascribed to saturation of its main metabolizing enzyme, S-mephenytoin hydroxylase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1587966     DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03864.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anti-ulcer drugs.

Authors:  R D Negro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  P Unge; T Andersson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Omeprazole and lansoprazole are not inducers of cytochrome P4501A2 under conventional therapeutic conditions.

Authors:  N Rizzo; C Padoin; S Palombo; J M Scherrmann; C Girre
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Drug-drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Ryuichi Ogawa; Hirotoshi Echizen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Lack of drug interaction between omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and theophylline.

Authors:  K Dilger; Z Zheng; U Klotz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Influence of endogenous and exogenous effectors on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline. Focus on biotransformation.

Authors:  U Tröger; F P Meyer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole.

Authors:  T Andersson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Gastroesophageal reflux in children: pathogenesis, prevalence, diagnosis, and role of proton pump inhibitors in treatment.

Authors:  Benjamin D Gold; James W Freston
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Are Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models Reporting the Right C(max)? Central Venous Versus Peripheral Sampling Site.

Authors:  Helen Musther; Katherine L Gill; Manoranjenni Chetty; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Malcolm Rowland; Masoud Jamei
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.009

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.