Literature DB >> 7648758

Influence of endogenous and exogenous effectors on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline. Focus on biotransformation.

U Tröger1, F P Meyer.   

Abstract

Theophylline has been widely used as a bronchodilatory drug for the treatment of neonatal apnoea in premature newborns and patients with obstructive airways disease. The development of analytical equipment and procedures to determine the systemic concentration of theophylline renders it possible to improve the effectiveness of theophylline therapy and reduce the incidence of toxic and adverse effects. Since the beginning of the 1970s, endogenous and exogenous factors (e.g. age, blood pH, concomitant diseases and drug therapy, meal preparation procedure, nutritional habits, pregnancy, gender, smoking and, to a lesser extent, biorhythms), influencing nearly all parameters of theophylline pharmacokinetics have been described. Drug absorption depends on galenic formulation, drug delivery, nutritional habits and the chemical derivatives used. The mean plasma protein binding rates depend on the method of plasma protein determination: acidic blood pH values and advanced age may result in reduced plasma proteins. The volume of distribution depends primarily on age; it is 2-fold greater in newborns than in adults. Furthermore, changes in blood pH values, the plasma protein content and the administration of concomitant drugs may vary this parameter. Biotransformation is the most clinically important pharmacokinetic parameter. Hepatic metabolism accounts for 90% of the metabolism of theophylline. Essentially, 2 microsomal isoenzymes of the cytochrome P450 system appear to be responsible for the N-methylation and 8-hydroxylation of the drug. Age and concomitant disease are the major endogenous effectors influencing biotransformation of theophylline, whereas biorhythms, gender and pregnancy are of lesser importance. Exogenous factors, such as concomitantly administered drugs, smoking and nutritional factors, affect biotransformation by inducing or inhibiting the metabolising enzymes. Because of intra- and interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, which may be increased by the presence of endogenous and/or exogenous effectors, it is necessary to supervise theophylline therapy by therapeutic drug monitoring if target concentrations are to be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7648758     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199528040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  275 in total

1.  Aging and drug interactions. II. Effect of phenytoin and smoking on the oxidation of theophylline and cortisol in healthy men.

Authors:  J J Crowley; B J Cusack; S G Jue; J R Koup; B K Park; R E Vestal
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Effect of piperine on bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of propranolol and theophylline in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  G Bano; R K Raina; U Zutshi; K L Bedi; R K Johri; S C Sharma
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Effect of smoking on theophylline disposition.

Authors:  S N Hunt; W J Jusko; A M Yurchak
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Effect of phenobarbital on the disposition of intravenous theophylline.

Authors:  K M Piafsky; D S Sitar; R I Ogilvie
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Phenytoin-theophylline interaction.

Authors:  J F Marquis; S G Carruthers; J D Spence; Y S Brownstone; J H Toogood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cigarette smoking and theophylline metabolism: effects of cimetidine.

Authors:  B J Cusack; G W Dawson; G D Mercer; R E Vestal
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in young children with asthma: comparison of rectal enema and suppositories.

Authors:  P Bolme; P O Edlund; M Eriksson; L Paalzow; B Winbladh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Effects of dietary protein on theophylline pharmacokinetics and caffeine and aminopyrine breath tests.

Authors:  D Juan; E M Worwag; D A Schoeller; A N Kotake; R L Hughes; M C Frederiksen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Etintidine-theophylline interaction study in humans.

Authors:  S M Huang; H S Weintraub; T B Marriott; B Marinan; R Abels; P T Leese
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.627

10.  Impact of cefaclor on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline.

Authors:  K Bachmann; J Schwartz; R B Forney; L Jauregui
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  6 in total

1.  Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, and theophylline.

Authors:  H Stass; D Kubitza
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Effect of combination therapy with ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J G Gillum; D S Israel; R B Scott; M W Climo; R E Polk
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Effect of alosetron on theophylline pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  K M Koch; B M Ricci; N S Hedayetullah; D Jewell; K E Kersey
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Effect of terbinafine on theophylline pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E F Trépanier; A N Nafziger; G W Amsden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Use of in vitro and in vivo data to estimate the likelihood of metabolic pharmacokinetic interactions.

Authors:  R J Bertz; G R Granneman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part II.

Authors:  R Kirsten; K Nelson; D Kirsten; B Heintz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.