Literature DB >> 15879076

Sources of mechanical power for uphill running in humans.

Thomas J Roberts1, Richard A Belliveau.   

Abstract

During uphill running limb muscles must perform net mechanical work to increase the body's potential energy, while during level running the net mechanical work required is negligible as long as speed is constant. The increased demands for work as running incline increases might be met by an increase in power output at all joints, or only a subset of joints. We used inverse dynamics to determine which joints modulate net work output in humans running uphill. We measured joint kinematics and ground reaction force during moderate speed running at 0 degrees , 6 degrees and 12 degrees inclines. Muscle force, joint power and work per step were determined at the ankle, knee and hip using inverse dynamics calculations. We found that virtually all of the increase in work output with increasing incline resulted from increases in net work done at the hip (-0.25+/-0.23 J kg(-1), level, vs 0.88+/-0.10 J kg(-1), 12 degrees incline), while the knee and ankle performed similar functions at all inclines. The increase in work output at the hip resulted primarily from a large increase in average net muscle moment during stance (2.07+/-17.84 Nm, level, vs 87.30+/-13.89 Nm, 12 degrees incline); joint excursion increased by only 20% (41.22+/-3.41 degrees , level, vs 49.22+/-2.35 degrees , 12 degrees incline). The increase in hip muscle moment and power was associated with a poorer mechanical advantage for producing force against the ground. The increase in hip moment with running incline allows for the production of the power necessary to lift the body. This power may be developed by hip extensors or by transfer of power from muscles at other joints via biarticular muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879076     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  27 in total

1.  The mechanical function of linked muscles in the guinea fowl hind limb.

Authors:  David J Ellerby; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The musculoskeletal system of humans is not tuned to maximize the economy of locomotion.

Authors:  David R Carrier; Christoph Anders; Nadja Schilling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Common motor mechanisms support body load in serially homologous legs of cockroaches in posture and walking.

Authors:  Laura A Quimby; Ayman S Amer; Sasha N Zill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion.

Authors:  Paul DeVita; Joseph Helseth; Tibor Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; Monica A Daley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Comparison of Plantar Pressure Distribution between Different Speed and Incline During Treadmill Jogging.

Authors:  I-Ju Ho; Yi-You Hou; Chich-Haung Yang; Wen-Lan Wu; Sheng-Kai Chen; Lan-Yuen Guo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  When hatchlings outperform adults: locomotor development in Australian brush turkeys (Alectura lathami, Galliformes).

Authors:  Kenneth P Dial; Brandon E Jackson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The foot is more than a spring: human foot muscles perform work to adapt to the energetic requirements of locomotion.

Authors:  Ryan Riddick; Dominic J Farris; Luke A Kelly
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Influence of the world's most challenging mountain ultra-marathon on energy cost and running mechanics.

Authors:  Gianluca Vernillo; Aldo Savoldelli; Andrea Zignoli; Pietro Trabucchi; Barbara Pellegrini; Grégoire P Millet; Federico Schena
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Modulation of joint moments and work in the goat hindlimb with locomotor speed and surface grade.

Authors:  Allison S Arnold; David V Lee; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.