Literature DB >> 24149400

Comparison of Plantar Pressure Distribution between Different Speed and Incline During Treadmill Jogging.

I-Ju Ho1, Yi-You Hou, Chich-Haung Yang, Wen-Lan Wu, Sheng-Kai Chen, Lan-Yuen Guo.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of changes in speed and incline slope on plantar pressure distribution of the foot during treadmill jogging. Plantar pressure parameters were measured with the Pedar-X system in twenty healthy girls (mean age of 20.7 years, mean height of 1.60m, and a mean weight of 53.35kg). Because variations in walking speed or slope can significantly change the magnitude of plantar pressure, comparisons of plantar pressure distribution between the two independent protocols during treadmill jogging were considered in this study. First, the subjects ran at the same speed of 2 m·s(-1) with different incline slopes of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%. Second, they ran on the same slope of 0% with different speeds of 1.5 m·s(-1), 2.0 m·s(-1), and 2.5 m·s(-1). The peak pressure of the eight plantar surface areas, apart from the medial forefoot and the hallux, significantly increased (p < 0.05) with an increase of 33% of peak pressure from 1.5 m·s(-1) to 2.5 m·s(-1) (speed) at heel region. In contrast, the peak pressures at the heel, medial fore-foot, toe and hallux decreased significantly (p < 0. 05) with increasing incline slope. At the heel, peak pressure reduced by 27% from 0% to 15% incline, however, pressure at the lateral midfoot region increased as following. Different speeds and incline slopes during jogging were associated with changes in plantar pressures. By systematic investigation of foot kinematics and plantar pressure during jogging with varying incline slope and speed, the results of this study provided further insight into foot biomechanics during jogging. Key pointsThe study aimed to compare the plantar pressure distribution of the foot between different incline and speed during treadmill jogging by using plantar insole measurement system.With the increase of speed, apart from the hallux and medical forefoot, the peak pressure of all regions was raised significantly.As the slope increased, there was reduced peak pressure of the heel, medial forefoot, and hallux and toes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Jogging; incline; plantar pressure; speed

Year:  2010        PMID: 24149400      PMCID: PMC3737957     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  33 in total

1.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running.

Authors:  T S Keller; A M Weisberger; J L Ray; S S Hasan; R G Shiavi; D M Spengler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Moment and power of lower limb joints in running.

Authors:  A Belli; Heikki Kyröläinen; P V Komi
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity).

Authors:  Paul D Thompson; David Buchner; Ileana L Pina; Gary J Balady; Mark A Williams; Bess H Marcus; Kathy Berra; Steven N Blair; Fernando Costa; Barry Franklin; Gerald F Fletcher; Neil F Gordon; Russell R Pate; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Antronette K Yancey; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of children in comparison with adults.

Authors:  E M Hennig; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1991-04

5.  Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: a barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners.

Authors:  Arne Nagel; Frauke Fernholz; Carolin Kibele; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 6.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of orthotic shoe inserts: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Razeghi; M E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination.

Authors:  C F Munro; D I Miller; A J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries.

Authors:  S P Messier; K A Pittala
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Fourier analysis of forces exerted in walking and running.

Authors:  R M Alexander; A S Jayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Running injuries. A review of the epidemiological literature.

Authors:  W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  6 in total

1.  Recovery of the Foot Loading Patterns of Children with Excess Weight after Losing Weight: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Ruoyi Li; Xiaohong Sun; Shiyang Yan; Yihong Zhao; Jitka Badurova; Luming Yang; Haojun Fan
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Plantar Pressure Detection with Fiber Bragg Gratings Sensing System.

Authors:  Tsair-Chun Liang; Jhe-Jhun Lin; Lan-Yuen Guo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Stiffness Effects in Rocker-Soled Shoes: Biomechanical Implications.

Authors:  Shih-Yun Lin; Pei-Fang Su; Chia-Hua Chung; Chi-Chun Hsia; Chih-Han Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of 8-week treadmill running with peroneal muscle functional electrical stimulation on laterally deviated centre of plantar pressure position and star excursion balance test performance.

Authors:  Zoe A Bamber; Patrick C Wheeler; Ian D Swain; Daniel Tp Fong
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2021-08-20

5.  Smart Insole Based on Flexi Force and Flex Sensor for Monitoring Different Body Postures.

Authors:  Rafique Ahmed Lakho; Zamir Ahmed Abro; Jun Chen; Rui Min
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Assessment of asymmetric leg loading before and after total hip arthroplasty using instrumented shoes.

Authors:  Alicia Martínez-Ramírez; Dirk Weenk; Pablo Lecumberri; Nico Verdonschot; Dean Pakvis; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.