Literature DB >> 15878630

Testing the new ICRU 62 'Planning Organ at Risk Volume' concept for the rectum.

Ludvig Paul Muren1, Asa Karlsdottir, Yngve Kvinnsland, Tore Wentzel-Larsen, Olav Dahl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To study the impact of the new ICRU 62 'Planning organ at Risk Volume' (PRV) concept on the relationship between rectum dose-volume histogram (DVH) data and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The acute gastro-intestinal (GI) RTOG toxicity in 127 prostate cancer patients prescribed a total dose of 70 Gy with conformal irradiation to either the prostate, the prostate and seminal vesicles or the whole pelvis (initial 50 Gy only) were analysed. DVHs were derived for the rectum only and for rectum extended with six PRV margin sets (narrow/intermediate/wide; anterior/anterior and posterior). The data was analysed using permutation tests, logistic regression and effective uniform dose (EUD) calculations.
RESULTS: Acute Grade 2 GI toxicity was seen in 22 of 127 cases (17%). Permutation tests showed that the difference between DVHs for patients with and without Grade 2 effects was significant, both for rectum only and rectum PRVs (P-value range: 0.02-0.04), with generally lower P-values for the PRVs. In the logistic regression, the fractional DVH variables (i.e. volumes) were significantly related to toxicity, with approximately 2-3 times as many significant dose levels for the PRVs as for rectum only. E.g. with wide anterior and posterior margins (16 and 11 mm, respectively) the relation was significant at 26 different dose levels (6-7, 13-14, 35-43, 60-71 and 73 Gy), compared to nine levels (38-40, 43-44 and 71-74 Gy) for rectum only. EUDs were significantly different for patients with and without Grade 2 effects both for rectum only and the PRVs (95% confidence interval for EUD increase with Grade 2 effects: 0.1-3.1 Gy).
CONCLUSIONS: All statistical methods applied indicated a small, but definite difference in DVH parameters between patients with versus those without Grade 2 effects. The difference was most pronounced when margins of 16 mm anterior and 11 mm posterior were applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15878630     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  10 in total

1.  The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning.

Authors:  S P Srivastava; C-W Cheng; I J Das
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  On voxel-by-voxel accumulated dose for prostate radiation therapy using deformable image registration.

Authors:  Jialu Yu; Nicholas Hardcastle; Kyoungkeun Jeong; Edward T Bender; Mark A Ritter; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-11

3.  Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling of late rectal bleeding following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A Test of the QUANTEC-recommended NTCP model.

Authors:  Mitchell Liu; Vitali Moiseenko; Alexander Agranovich; Anand Karvat; Winkle Kwan; Ziad H Saleh; Aditya A Apte; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Dose/volume-response relations for rectal morbidity using planned and simulated motion-inclusive dose distributions.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Aditya Apte; Joseph O Deasy; Àsa Karlsdóttir; Vitali Moiseenko; Mitchell Liu; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Statistical simulations to estimate motion-inclusive dose-volume histograms for prediction of rectal morbidity following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Aditya Apte; Joseph O Deasy; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Dosimetric predictors of diarrhea during radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sanguineti; Eugene J Endres; Maria Pia Sormani; Brent C Parker
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  What is the impact of diabetes mellitus on radiation induced acute proctitis after radical radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma prostate? A prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Abduelmenem Alashkham; Catherine Paterson; Stephen Hubbard; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14

8.  Comparison of survival, acute toxicities, and dose-volume parameters between intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without internal target volume delineation method and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients: A retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Qin Liang; Sen-Quan Feng; Wen-Jia Xie; Qiong-Zhi Jiang; Yan-Fen Yang; Ren Luo; Elizabeth A Kidd; Tian-Tian Zhai; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Evaluating the predictive value of quantec rectum tolerance dose suggestions on acute rectal toxicity in prostate carcinoma patients treated with IMRT.

Authors:  E Elif Ozkan; Alper Ozseven; Z Arda Kaymak Cerkesli
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-09

10.  Impact of diabetes on gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity after radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancy.

Authors:  Emine Elif Özkan; Evrim Erdemoğlu; Jalal Raoufi
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.