Literature DB >> 15878530

Results from the prospective registry of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (RETA): mid term results to five years.

S M Thomas1, J D Beard, M Ireland, S Ayers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the mid-term outcomes up to 5 years following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR), following its initial introduction into practice in the UK.
DESIGN: A prospective voluntary Registry of Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms (RETA) collected demographic and risk factor data, short term (30 day) outcomes and follow up outcomes up to 5 years from the 41 centres that initially undertook EVAR in the UK.
RESULTS: Short term outcomes (30 days): 90.4% of aneurysms were successfully excluded, 6.1% had persistent endoleaks and 5.8% of patients had died. Follow up was obtained from 30 days up to 5 years (mean 3.1 years). Returns rates for requested follow up data were 87% at 1 year and 77, 65, 52 and 51% at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively. Ninety percent of deaths at follow up were unrelated to the stent-graft or aneurysm. Persistent proximal type I endoleak was associated with significant mortality both from attempted open repair or from rupture if untreated. Other endoleaks were more benign. Complications related to the aneurysm or device occurred at an average rate of 15% per annum. The most common complications were secondary endoleaks or graft migration. Endovascular treatment was preferred if treatment was necessary for graft complications. The cumulative freedom from secondary procedure (Kaplan-Meier) were 87, 77, 70, 65 and 62% at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years of follow up, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Registry data provides useful information to guide the design of more formal trials. Collecting follow up from voluntarily submitted data is difficult. The registry data remains well ahead of the trial data, but indicate that long term follow up is required in these trials, because of the high rate of complications seen at follow up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15878530     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Ian M Nordon; Robert J Hinchliffe; Ian M Loftus; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Endovascular repair or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  S A Badger; D W Harkin; P H Blair; P K Ellis; F Kee; R Forster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Alec Knight; John Phillips; Elias Mossialos; Peter Littlejohns; Anne Schilder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysmal Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Jordan.

Authors:  Kristi E Janho; Mohammed A Rashaideh; Jan Shishani; Muhannad Jalokh; Hazem Haboub
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2019-12-31

5.  Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection Repair (EVAR) in Iran: Descriptive Midterm Follow-up Results.

Authors:  Ali Mohammad Haji Zeinali; Mehrab Marzban; Mohammadreza Zafarghandi; Mahmood Shirzad; Shapour Shirani; Roshanak Mahmoodian; Mehrdad Sheikhvatan; Masoumeh Lotfi-Tokaldany
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 0.212

6.  Global Post-Market Clinical Follow-up of the Treovance Stent-Graft for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: One-Year Results From the RATIONALE Registry.

Authors:  Raman Uberoi; Carlo Setacci; Mario Lescan; Antonio Lorido; David Murray; Zoltán Szeberin; Tomasz Zubilewicz; Vincent Riambau; Angsu Chartrungsan; Jörg Tessarek
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.487

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.