Literature DB >> 15877758

Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat.

Daniel Rothamel1, Frank Schwarz, Martin Sager, Monika Herten, Anton Sculean, Jürgen Becker.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes in rats. Five commercially available and three experimental membranes (VN) were included: (1) BioGide (BG) (non-cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens), (2) BioMend (BM), (3) BioMendExtend (BME) (glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (4) Ossix (OS) (enzymatic-cross-linked bovine type I collagen), (5) TutoDent (TD) (non-cross-linked bovine type I collagen, and (6-8) VN(1-3) (chemical cross-linked porcine type I and III collagens). Specimens were randomly allocated in unconnected subcutaneous pouches separated surgically on the back of 40 wistar rats, which were divided into five groups (2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks), including eight animals each. After 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks of healing, the rats were sacrificed and explanted specimens were prepared for histologic and histometric analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: biodegradation over time, vascularization, tissue integration, and foreign body reaction. Highest vascularization and tissue integration was noted for BG followed by BM, BME, and VN(1); TD, VN(2), and VN(3) showed prolongated, while OS exhibited no vascularization. Subsequently, biodegradation of BG, BM, BME and VN(1) was faster than TD, VN(2), and VN(3). OS showed only a minute amount of superficial biodegradation 24 weeks following implantation. Biodegradation of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) was associated with the presence of inflammatory cells. Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that cross-linking of bovine and porcine-derived collagen types I and III was associated with (i) prolonged biodegradation, (ii) decreased tissue integration and vascularization, and (iii) in case of TD, BM, BME, VN(2), and VN(3) foreign body reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877758     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  62 in total

1.  A new laboratory model using bull and boar spermatozoa and fluorescent beads to assess a membrane's occlusive potential.

Authors:  M Szellö; F Janett; C Ewald; M Music; B Sener; T Attin; P R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  [In vitro testing of thrombocyte adhesion to different collagenous hemostyptic agents].

Authors:  D Rothamel; F Schwarz; V Stoldt; M Herten; C Kotthaus; J Becker
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-05

3.  To cross-link or not to cross-link? Cross-linking associated foreign body response of collagen-based devices.

Authors:  Luis M Delgado; Yves Bayon; Abhay Pandit; Dimitrios I Zeugolis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Cutaneous wound healing after treatment with plant-derived human recombinant collagen flowable gel.

Authors:  Shani Shilo; Sigal Roth; Tal Amzel; Tamar Harel-Adar; Eran Tamir; Frida Grynspan; Oded Shoseyov
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Javairia Qureshi; Abdullah M Alshahrani; Heba Nassar; Yuichi Ikeda; Michael Glogauer; Bernhard Ganss
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Sugar-based collagen membrane cross-linking increases barrier capacity of membranes.

Authors:  Po-Ju Chia-Lai; Anna Orlowska; Sarah Al-Maawi; Andre Dias; Yunxin Zhang; Xuejiu Wang; Niklas Zender; Robert Sader; C James Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Evaluation of Biocompatibility of Different Membrane Surfaces Using Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Lara Schorn; Jörg Handschel; Julian Lommen; Felix Paulssen VON Beck; Rita Depprich; Norbert Kübler; Henrik Holtmann
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  The Condensation of Collagen Leads to an Extended Standing Time and a Decreased Pro-inflammatory Tissue Response to a Newly Developed Pericardium-based Barrier Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Tristan Gueldenpfennig; Alireza Houshmand; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck; Stevo Najman; Sanja Stojanovic; Tadas Korzinskas; Ralf Smeets; Martin Gosau; Jens Pissarek; Steffen Emmert
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Root coverage using coronally advanced flap with porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Kleber Tanaka Suzuki; Cristhiam de Jesus Hernandez Martinez; Milena Irie Suemi; Daniela Bazan Palioto; Michel Reis Messora; Sérgio Luis Scombatti de Souza; Arthur Belem Novaes; Flavia A Chaves Furlaneto; Mario Taba
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Generation of an artificial skin construct containing a non-degradable fiber mesh: a potential transcutaneous interface.

Authors:  Frederick Cahn; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.