Literature DB >> 15877749

Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year case series prospective study.

Juan Blanco1, Angel Alonso, Mariano Sanz.   

Abstract

One of the key factors for attaining osseointegration is the presence of an adequate osseous volume. In patients with inadequate osseous width or height, a bone augmentation using the guided bone regeneration (GBR) concept may be applied either with a simultaneous or a staged approach. The aim of this multicenter prospective case series study was to evaluate the efficacy and predictability of the GBR technique (simultaneous approach) in patients with peri-implant osseous defects, both dehiscences and fenestrations. Results 5 years post-treatment (survival rates and marginal bone level) were assessed. A total of 19 consecutive patients with 26 peri-implant osseous defects (20 dehiscences and six fenestrations) were treated during the period from September 1992 to June 1993 with a simultaneous GBR approach using non-resorbable membranes combined with autogenous bone grafts or decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft. The mean osseous augmentation was 94.8%. Marginal bone levels at re-entry and 5 years after surgery were calculated from standardized periapical radiographs. One implant was lost 3 months after loading. Thus, the cumulative survival rate was 96.1% after 5 years. The mean marginal bone level after 5 years was 2.03 mm (SD=+/-0.5), without a difference between mesial and distal sites. This study demonstrates that implants with peri-implant defects that are treated with GBR had similar survival rates and crestal bone levels compared with implants in native bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877749     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01106.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

1.  Accuracy of linear measurements around dental implants by means of cone beam computed tomography with different exposure parameters.

Authors:  Lauren O L Bohner; Pedro Tortamano; Juliana Marotti
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Periosteal Releasing Incision With Diode Laser in Guided Bone Regeneration Procedure: A Case Series.

Authors:  Neda Moslemi; Afshin Khorsand; Sepehr Torabi; Aysan Shahnaz; Yadollah Soleimani Shayesteh; Reza Fekrazad
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-27

3.  Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Ridges with Insufficient Bones using Different Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Vikas Vaibhav; Abhishek Sinha; Deepika Bolisetty; Abhishek Verma; Kunal Kumar; Sanjeev Singh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  A preliminary randomized clinical trial comparing diode laser and scalpel periosteal incision during implant surgery: impact on postoperative morbidity and implant survival.

Authors:  Aysan Shahnaz; Raika Jamali; Farnush Mohammadi; Afshin Khorsand; Neda Moslemi; Reza Fekrazad
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Differences between buccal and lingual bone quality and quantity of peri-implant regions.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Kathy L Elias; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Hyun-Jung Kwon; Matthew Clements; William A Brantley; Damian J Lee; Jung-Suk Han
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-01-02

6.  [Clinical and radiological results after augmentation procedures - a prospective study].

Authors:  Karl Andreas Schlegel; Tarek Karascholi; Matthias Fenner; Emeka Nkenke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-07-20

7.  Dental implants with versus without peri-implant bone defects treated with guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Amparo Aloy-Prósper; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Maria Peñarrocha-Diago; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-07-01

8.  Use of buccal fat pad to repair post-extraction peri-implant bone defects in the posterior maxilla. A preliminary prospective study.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha-Diago; Rocío Alonso-González; Amparo Aloy-Prósper; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Fabio Camacho; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-11-01

9.  The preosteoblast response of electrospinning PLGA/PCL nanofibers: effects of biomimetic architecture and collagen I.

Authors:  Yunzhu Qian; Hanbang Chen; Yang Xu; Jianxin Yang; Xuefeng Zhou; Feimin Zhang; Ning Gu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-08-25

10.  A retrospective cohort study of how alveolar ridge preservation affects the need of alveolar ridge augmentation at posterior tooth implant sites.

Authors:  Kai-Fang Hu; Ying-Chu Lin; Yu-Ting Huang; Yu-Hsiang Chou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.