Literature DB >> 15876653

Possible sources of neuroprotection following subretinal silicon chip implantation in RCS rats.

Machelle T Pardue1, Michael J Phillips, Hang Yin, Alcides Fernandes, Yian Cheng, Alan Y Chow, Sherry L Ball.   

Abstract

Current retinal prosthetics are designed to stimulate existing neural circuits in diseased retinas to create a visual signal. However, implantation of retinal prosthetics may create a neurotrophic environment that also leads to improvements in visual function. Possible sources of increased neuroprotective effects on the retina may arise from electrical activity generated by the prosthetic, mechanical injury due to surgical implantation, and/or presence of a chronic foreign body. This study evaluates these three neuroprotective sources by implanting Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats, a model of retinitis pigmentosa, with a subretinal implant at an early stage of photoreceptor degeneration. Treatment groups included rats implanted with active and inactive devices, as well as sham-operated. These groups were compared to unoperated controls. Evaluation of retinal function throughout an 18 week post-implantation period demonstrated transient functional improvements in eyes implanted with an inactive device at 6, 12 and 14 weeks post-implantation. However, the number of photoreceptors located directly over or around the implant or sham incision was significantly increased in eyes implanted with an active or inactive device or sham-operated. These results indicate that in the RCS rat localized neuroprotection of photoreceptors from mechanical injury or a chronic foreign body may provide similar results to subretinal electrical stimulation at the current output evaluated here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876653     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/1/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  18 in total

1.  Effects of common anesthetics on eye movement and electroretinogram.

Authors:  Govind Nair; Moon Kim; Tsukasa Nagaoka; Darin E Olson; Peter M Thulé; Machelle T Pardue; Timothy Q Duong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  [Status of the subretinal implant project. An overview].

Authors:  F Gekeler; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Retinal expression of Fgf2 in RCS rats with subretinal microphotodiode array.

Authors:  Vincent T Ciavatta; Moon Kim; Paul Wong; John M Nickerson; R Keith Shuler; George Y McLean; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Retinal Anatomy and Electrode Array Position in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients After Argus II Implantation: An International Study.

Authors:  Ninel Z Gregori; Natalia F Callaway; Catherine Hoeppner; Alex Yuan; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; William Feuer; Hossein Ameri; J Fernando Arevalo; Albert J Augustin; David G Birch; Gislin Dagnelie; Salvatore Grisanti; Janet L Davis; Paul Hahn; James T Handa; Allen C Ho; Suber S Huang; Mark S Humayun; Raymond Iezzi; K Thiran Jayasundera; Gregg T Kokame; Byron L Lam; Jennifer I Lim; Naresh Mandava; Sandra R Montezuma; Lisa Olmos de Koo; Peter Szurman; Lejla Vajzovic; Peter Wiedemann; James Weiland; Jiong Yan; David N Zacks
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Neuroprotective dose response in RCS rats implanted with microphotodiode arrays.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Moon K Kim; Tiffany A Walker; Amanda E Faulkner; Alan Y Chow; Vincent T Ciavatta
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 7.  Building the bionic eye: an emerging reality and opportunity.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  [Effects of transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with Stargardt's disease].

Authors:  T Röck; A Schatz; L Naycheva; M Gosheva; J Pach; B Wilhelm; T Peters; K U Bartz-Schmidt; E Zrenner; G Willmann; F Gekeler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation of retina to treat longstanding retinal artery occlusion.

Authors:  Koichi Inomata; Kei Shinoda; Hisao Ohde; Kazushige Tsunoda; Gen Hanazono; Itaru Kimura; Mitsuko Yuzawa; Kazuo Tsubota; Yozo Miyake
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Transcutaneous electrical retinal stimulation therapy for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Kei Shinoda; Yutaka Imamura; Sayaka Matsuda; Maiko Seki; Atsuro Uchida; Terry Grossman; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.