Literature DB >> 15876266

Handheld computers and paper diaries for documenting the use of factor concentrates used in haemophilia home therapy: a qualitative study.

E Arnold1, N Heddle, S Lane, J Sek, T Almonte, I Walker.   

Abstract

A recently published randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that adherence to infusion diary record keeping was improved by the use of handheld computers. In this study, attitudes to record keeping were explored and patient preferences regarding the method of recording determined for the patients who participated in the trial. Qualitative study consisting of individual semi-structured interviews with 20 severely affected patients with haemophilia who participated in an RCT. Individuals were purposefully sampled based on their recent method of record keeping and whether child or adult. Analysis employed a constant comparative method to identify key themes from the data. Most individuals (19 of 20, 95%) considered record keeping to be important. They readily identified reasons to keep records: to benefit themselves, their families, clinical staff, product distributors and manufacturers. Keeping records helps them: feel a part of the health care team; have confidence they would be notified of product recalls; review their past history; improve their ability to advocate for themselves and improve communication among all parties. Record keeping, particularly when using paper diaries, can be burdensome and a challenge to maintain consistently. All 10 individuals (100%) who had used both paper diaries and handheld computers preferred the latter. Most patients understand that record keeping can be of benefit to them. Clinics can use this knowledge to inspire other patients by developing educational programmes that de-emphasize authority. In addition, given the evidence of both patients' preference for handheld computers, and the effectiveness of this approach documented in an RCT, switching to handheld computers is likely to improve record keeping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876266     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01095.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  4 in total

Review 1.  Health information technology to facilitate communication involving health care providers, caregivers, and pediatric patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Stephen James Gentles; Cynthia Lokker; K Ann McKibbon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 2.  A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection.

Authors:  Shannon J Lane; Nancy M Heddle; Emmy Arnold; Irwin Walker
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 3.  Telehealth Interventions for Improving Self-Management in Patients With Hemophilia: Scoping Review of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Wenji Qian; Teddy Tai-Ning Lam; Henry Hon Wai Lam; Chi-Kong Li; Yin Ting Cheung
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia.

Authors:  Kapil Saxena
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2013-05-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.