Literature DB >> 15876231

Opening up: psychiatric nurses' experiences of participating in reflection groups focusing on the use of coercion.

B Olofsson1.   

Abstract

Psychiatric staff report that the use of coercion towards patients in psychiatric care engenders feelings of discomfort and conflicts. The aim of this study was to describe psychiatric nurses' experiences of participating in reflection groups focused on the use of coercion, in relation to their views regarding systematic clinical supervision and staff support. Twenty-one nurses who had participated in reflection groups were interviewed retrospectively. The structured interview focused on: (i) their views of clinical supervision and support in general; (ii) their views of clinical supervision and support specifically concerning the use of coercion; and (iii) their experiences of participating in groups reflecting the use of coercion. Nurses were largely positive about participating in reflection groups, as expressed in the subthemes: having time for reflection; being confirmed; gaining new perspectives; sharing fellowship with colleagues; and relating more effectively to patients. Complications concerning participation in the reflection groups and other forms of clinical supervision as reported by nurses were: providing time for participation; having a common aim; being vulnerable in difficult situations; and assuming that the need for supervision and support could indicate that they were not coping with their job.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876231     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00827.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  2 in total

1.  A comparison of risk and protective factors related to suicide ideation among residents and specialists in academic medicine.

Authors:  Mari Eneroth; Marie Gustafsson Sendén; Lise T Løvseth; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Ann Fridner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Outcomes of moral case deliberation--the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD).

Authors:  Mia Svantesson; Jan Karlsson; Pierre Boitte; Jan Schildman; Linda Dauwerse; Guy Widdershoven; Reidar Pedersen; Martijn Huisman; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.