Literature DB >> 15875569

Why do multiple traits determine mating success? Differential use in female choice and male competition in a water boatman.

Ulrika Candolin1.   

Abstract

Mating success is often determined by multiple traits, but why this occurs is largely unknown. Much attention has been paid to female preferences for multiple traits, but surprisingly few researchers have addressed the possibility that multiple traits are important because they serve different functions in female choice and male-male competition. Differential trait function could result from a conflict of interest between the sexes or from constraints forcing the sexes to pay attention to different traits. I show that traits determined at distinct life-history stages differ in their importance in female choice and male-male competition in a water boatman Sigara falleni. Juvenile conditions determined body and foreleg pala size and were the main determinants of mating success under female choice, whereas adult conditions determined body mass and influenced mating success when male competition was included. This differential use of condition-dependent traits under the two selection regimes appeared to arise partly from a conflict between the sexes, since the two selection forces (female choice and male competition) conflict for selection on pala size, and partly from constraints, as females appeared unable to assess adult condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15875569      PMCID: PMC1634947          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.

Authors:  J S Kotiaho; L W Simmons; J L Tomkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies.

Authors:  P David; T Bjorksten; K Fowler; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research.

Authors:  C Cordero; W G Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  The effect of past condition on a multicomponent sexual signal.

Authors:  Hannes Scheuber; Alain Jacot; Martin W G Brinkhof
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Opposing selection on a sexually dimorphic trait through female choice and male competition in a water boatman.

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Should females prefer dominant males?

Authors:  A Qvarnström; E Forsgren
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Differential effects of mate competition and mate choice on eastern tiger salamanders

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1995-02

10.  Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird.

Authors:  Staffan Andersson; Sarah R Pryke; Jonas Ornborg; Michael J Lawes; Malte Andersson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  8 in total

1.  Species-specific responsiveness of four enzymes to endosulfan and predation risk questions their usefulness as general biomarkers.

Authors:  Hendrik Trekels; Frank Van de Meutter; Lieven Bervoets; Robby Stoks
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Females prefer athletes, males fear the disadvantaged: different signals used in female choice and male competition have varied consequences.

Authors:  Robbie S Wilson; Catriona H Condon; Gwendolyn David; Sean Fitzgibbon; Amanda C Niehaus; Kirstin Pratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Multiple coloured ornaments in male common kestrels: different mechanisms to convey quality.

Authors:  Pablo Vergara; Juan A Fargallo
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-02-16

4.  Migration strategy and divergent sexual selection on bird song.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Selvino R de Kort; Javier Pérez-Tris; José Luis Tellería
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Phenotypic covariance structure and its divergence for acoustic mate attraction signals among four cricket species.

Authors:  Susan M Bertram; Lauren P Fitzsimmons; Emily M McAuley; Howard D Rundle; Root Gorelick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Male courtship behavior and weapon trait as indicators of indirect benefit in the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris.

Authors:  Yû Suzaki; Masako Katsuki; Takahisa Miyatake; Yasukazu Okada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gregarines modulate insect responses to sublethal insecticide residues.

Authors:  Marina Wolz; Alia Schrader; Eileen Whitelaw; Caroline Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.

Authors:  Samuel J Tazzyman; Yoh Iwasa; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.