Literature DB >> 12689784

Visual feedback induces opposite effects on elementary centre of gravity and centre of pressure minus centre of gravity motions in undisturbed upright stance.

Patrice Rougier1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the instantaneous effects of visual feedback on undisturbed stance control mechanisms.
DESIGN: The controlling variable, the centre of pressure trajectories, recorded using a force platform, were decomposed into two elementary motions: (1) the horizontal displacements of the centre of gravity and (2) the vertical projection of the difference between centre of pressure and the centre of gravity. These motions were processed through frequential analysis and modelled as fractional Brownian motion.
BACKGROUND: Even though visual feedback protocols are advantageously used for rehabilitation purposes, their immediate effects from biomechanical and motor control points of view need to be assessed.
METHODS: Twelve healthy adult subjects were tested through eyes open and visual feedback conditions.
RESULTS: A significant amplitude increase in the difference between the centre of pressure and the centre of gravity motions and a decrease in the centre of gravity motions are observed during visual feedback. The fractional Brownian motion modelling analysis reveals an enhanced control of these elementary motions. The point at which the corrective process is initiated is increased with visual feedback whereas the time delay remains the same.
CONCLUSIONS: The decrease of the centre of pressure displacements classically observed through visual feedback protocol initially results in a reduction of the centre of gravity motions and an augmentation of the difference between centre of pressure and centre of gravity motions, hence suggesting increased muscular activity. RELEVANCE: Precise knowledge of the effects generated by such feedback protocol should allow to optimise it as a rehabilitation tool.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12689784     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00003-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Gilel Nafati
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-08

2.  Compatibility of postural behavior induced by two aspects of visual feedback: time delay and scale display.

Authors:  P Rougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Relation between postural control assessment with eyes open and centre of pressure visual feedback effects in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Samir Boudrahem; Patrice R Rougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Beyond deficit or compensation: new insights on postural control after long-term total visual loss.

Authors:  Maitê M Russo; Thiago Lemos; Luís A Imbiriba; Nathalia L Ribeiro; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Children with cerebral palsy exhibit greater and more regular postural sway than typically developing children.

Authors:  Stella F Donker; Annick Ledebt; Melvyn Roerdink; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modification of knee flexion during walking with use of a real-time personalized avatar.

Authors:  H Agopyan; J Griffet; T Poirier; J Bredin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-11-14

7.  Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults.

Authors:  Mônica S V Tomomitsu; Angelica Castilho Alonso; Eurica Morimoto; Tatiana G Bobbio; Julia M D Greve
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  The effects of augmented visual feedback during balance training in Parkinson's disease: study design of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Maarten R C van den Heuvel; Erwin E H van Wegen; Cees J T de Goede; Ingrid A L Burgers-Bots; Peter J Beek; Andreas Daffertshofer; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.

Authors:  Michael W Kennedy; Charles R Crowell; Michael Villano; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kręcisz; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.