Literature DB >> 15874921

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions with the Zenith TX1 and TX2 thoracic grafts: intermediate-term results.

Roy K Greenberg1, Sean O'Neill, Esteban Walker, Fady Haddad, Sean P Lyden, Lars G Svensson, Bruce Lytle, Daniel G Clair, Kenneth Ouriel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective study was designed to assess the technical success and outcome after patients with thoracic aortic pathology at high risk for conventional therapy were treated with the Zenith TX1 and TX2 endovascular graft.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2004, patients at high risk for conventional surgical therapy presenting with chronic aortic dissections, thoracic aneurysms, or aortobronchial or aortoesophageal fistulas were treated with a single- or multiple-piece endovascular grafts. Surgical modification of proximal or distal fixation sites was performed when necessary to establish adequate regions for device landing zones. Follow-up studies included radiographic evaluation before discharge and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. Aortic morphologic characteristics were determined by using three-dimensional imaging studies and centerline of flow measurements. Statistical analyses were performed with Kaplan Meier analysis to assess survival, factors predictive of poor outcome, and morphologic changes, including sac shrinkage.
RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (42% women) were treated, including 81 aneurysms, 15 aortic dissections (with aneurysms), 2 patients with fistulous connections (1 aortobronchial and 1 aortoesophageal), 1 subclavian artery aneurysm, and 1 aortic rupture. Mean follow-up and aneurysm size were 14 months and 62 mm, respectively. Most patients (55%) had undergone prior aortic aneurysm repair. Surgical modifications were required to create adequate implantation sites in 29% patients, including 14 elephant trunk/arch reconstructions, 18 carotid-subclavian bypasses, and 4 visceral vessel bypasses. Iliac conduits were required in 19 patients. Overall mortality was 17%, and aneurysm-related mortality was 14% at 1 year. Sac regression (>5 mm maximum diameter decrease) was observed in 52% and 56% at 12 and 24 months. Growth was noted in one patient (1.6%) at 12 months. Endoleaks were detected in eight patients (8.5%) at 30 days and three patients (6%) at 12 months. Secondary interventions were required in 15 patients. Migration (>10 mm) of the proximal or distal stent was noted in three patients (6%) (two proximal and one distal), none of which required treatment or resulted in an adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable intermediate-term outcomes have been achieved in the treatment of high-risk patients in the setting of both favorable and challenging anatomic situations with these devices. The complexity of the patient population, in contrast to endovascular infrarenal repair, attests to the differences in the pathophysiology aortic disease in the anatomic beds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15874921     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  12 in total

1.  Endovascular stent graft repair for thoracic aortic aneurysms: the history and the present in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Kawaguchi; Hideyuki Shimizu; Akihiro Yoshitake; Taro Shimazaki; Toru Iwahashi; Hitoshi Ogino; Shin Ishimaru; Hiroshi Shigematsu; Ryohei Yozu
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2013-04-20

2.  Incomplete endograft apposition to the aortic arch: bird-beak configuration increases risk of endoleak formation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Takuya Ueda; Dominik Fleischmann; Michael D Dake; Geoffrey D Rubin; Daniel Y Sze
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Thoracic endovascular repair of chronic type B aortic dissection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael L Williams; Madeleine de Boer; Bridget Hwang; Bruce Wilson; John Brookes; Nicholas McNamara; David H Tian; Timothy Shiraev; Ourania Preventza
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-01

4.  Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akin; Stephan Kische; Tim C Rehders; Christoph A Nienaber; Mathias Rauchhaus; Hüseyin Ince
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  Midterm outcomes of open surgical repair compared with thoracic endovascular repair for isolated descending thoracic aortic disease.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Lee; Cheol Hyun Chung; Sung Ho Jung; Jae Won Lee; Ji Hoon Shin; Ki young Ko; Hyun Ki Yoon; Suk Jung Choo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Endovascular stent-graft placement for vascular failure of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Kurimoto; Kiyofumi Morishita; Yasufumi Asai
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006

7.  Economic Impacts of Treatment for Type II or III Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the United States.

Authors:  Mickael Vaislic; Claude Vaislic; Jean-Marc Alsac; Amira Benjelloun; Sidney Chocron; Thierry Unterseeh; Jean-Noel Fabiani
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-02-24

8.  Rescue Technique for Malposition Caused by Mislabeled Stent Graft in Thoracic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Hyuk Jae Jung; Bong Soo Son; Do Hyung Kim; Sang Su Lee
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2017-12-31

9.  The Risk Factors and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  Yun-Ho Jeon; Chi-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-05

10.  Mid-Term Results of Using the Seal Thoracic Stent Graft in Cases of Aortopathy: A Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Jun Woo Cho; Jae Seok Jang; Chul Ho Lee; Sun Hyun Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.