Literature DB >> 15870604

Frequency of goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks.

Sukhpal Singh Sandhu1, Sandip Chattopadhyay, Michael Kevin Birch, Neeta Ray-Chaudhuri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate how quickly Goldmann applanation tonometers used in clinical practice develop calibration errors, and to determine the frequency of checks required to detect these errors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective check of the calibration error of all Haag-Streit Goldmann applanation tonometers in the department at month zero, month one, and month four. The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration check weight bar by two independent observers. Calibration errors were classed as +/-0.5 to 2.5 mm Hg, +/-3 to 4 mm Hg, or >+/-4 mm Hg. Tonometers with a calibration error greater than +/-2.5 mm Hg were returned to the manufacturer for re-calibration.
RESULTS: At month zero 2 of 34 (5.9%), at month one 3 of 29 (10.3%), and at month four 0 of 33 (0.0%) tonometers fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of +/-0.5 mm Hg. A total of 14 of 34 (41.2%) tonometers at month zero, 10 of 29 (34.5%) tonometers at month one, and 17 of 33 (51.5%) tonometers at month four were identified to have calibration errors greater than +/-2.5 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: Goldmann applanation tonometers are not as accurate as the manufacturer's recommended calibration error tolerance of +/-0.5 mm Hg would suggest. Calibration error of less than +/-2.5 mm Hg is clinically acceptable. Calibration error checks should be carried out once monthly and tonometers with calibration error greater than +/-2.5 mm Hg returned to the manufacturer for re-calibration. Additional checks should be made if tonometers suffer specific damage. Ideally individual ophthalmologists should check calibration before each session.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15870604     DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200506000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range.

Authors:  S Munkwitz; A Elkarmouty; E M Hoffmann; N Pfeiffer; H Thieme
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Early and frequent development of ocular hypertension in children with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  Emi Kawaguchi; Kenji Ishikura; Riku Hamada; Yoshinobu Nagaoka; Yoshihiko Morikawa; Tomoyuki Sakai; Yuko Hamasaki; Hiroshi Hataya; Eiichiro Noda; Masaru Miura; Takashi Ando; Masataka Honda
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  [Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  F Rüfer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Potential effects of systematic errors in intraocular pressure measurements on screening for ocular hypertension.

Authors:  M J Turner; S L Graham; A P Avolio; P Mitchell
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Prevalence of calibration errors in goldmann applanation tonometers.

Authors:  Heydar Amini; Sasan Moghimi; Mahboobe Golestani; Mahmood Jabbarvand; Reza Zarei; Mohammadreza Esmaili; Zohre Esfandiarpour; Reza Soltani-Moghadam
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2009-07

7.  Rectifying calibration error of Goldmann applanation tonometer is easy!

Authors:  Nikhil S Choudhari; Krishna P Moorthy; Vinod B Tungikar; Mohan Kumar; Ronnie George; Harsha L Rao; Sirisha Senthil; Lingam Vijaya; Chandra Sekhar Garudadri
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Innovative ophthalmology.

Authors:  Sundaram Natarajan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.