Literature DB >> 15869694

Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?

Sarah L Haywood1, Martin J Pickering, Holly P Branigan.   

Abstract

What affects speakers' production of ambiguous utterances in dialogue? They might consider ease of production for themselves, or ease of comprehension for their addressees. Previous research has demonstrated that ease of production plays a role in speakers' syntactic choices, but that ease of comprehension does not. However, such studies have not employed dialogues that involve role swapping on a turn-by-turn basis. In our experiment, participants alternated in giving and following instructions to move objects around on a grid. They tended to repeat the syntactic form just used by their interlocutor, reflecting sensitivity to ease of production. More interestingly, they were more likely to disambiguate their utterances when the visual context was potentially ambiguous than when it was not, reflecting sensitivity to ease of comprehension. We conclude that speakers pay attention to their beliefs about their addressees' ease of comprehension, in addition to considering ease of production for themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869694     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01541.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  14 in total

1.  Tic Tac Toe: effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production.

Authors:  Duane G Watson; Jennifer E Arnold; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-08-13

2.  The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming.

Authors:  William S Horton
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2007

3.  Ambiguity, Accessibility, and a Division of Labor for Communicative Success.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2008-01-01

Review 4.  Structural priming: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Elizabeth R Schotter
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Predictions of Miscommunication in Verbal Communication During Collaborative Joint Action.

Authors:  Alexandra Paxton; Jennifer M Roche; Alyssa Ibarra; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language.

Authors:  Melissa C Duff; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.