Literature DB >> 15868777

Misrepresentations of the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis.

Robert M White1.   

Abstract

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis (TSUS) is the subject of medical research, healthcare, ethics, race relations and fictitious media portrayals (e.g., movie, play). Unraveling misrepresentations about the TSUS is important because prevailing views continue to contribute to alleged mistrust of the medical system by the black community and compromised doctor-patient and researcher-participant relationships. A comparative analysis of standard TSUS information was conducted and included evidenced-based alternative information in an effort to: (a) contextualize the TSUS with accurate medical, public health and historical information and (b) balance claims of racism, nontreatment and denial of treatment. An article in the Winter 2003 Radcliffe Quarterly misrepresented the images of two historical African-American health institutions, the John A. Andrew Memorial Hospital and the Tuskegee Veterans Administration Hospital. A critical analysis challenges these pictorial misrepresentations and documents, in part, a continuing and prevailing pattern of biased misrepresentations in discussions about the TSUS. The National Medical Association (NMA) and the Journal of the National Medical Association have a history of advocacy for African-American health, a record of combating racial discrimination and a quest for truth about the status of the black community. As past NMA historical notables have performed through their advancement, service and leadership, health professionals now have the opportunity, obligation and information to educate the American community about the TSUS with evidenced-based information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868777      PMCID: PMC2568733     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  33 in total

1.  Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin; H G Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  THE TUSKEGEE STUDY OF UNTREATED SYPHILIS; THE 30TH YEAR OF OBSERVATION.

Authors:  D H ROCKWELL; A R YOBS; M B MOORE
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1964-12

3.  Environmental factors in the Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis.

Authors:  S OLANSKY; L SIMPSON; S H SCHUMAN
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Twenty years of followup experience in a long-range medical study.

Authors:  E RIVERS; S H SCHUMAN; L SIMPSON; S OLANSKY
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1953-04       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Untreated syphilis in the male Negro; observation of abnormalities over 16 years.

Authors:  P J PESARE; T J BAUER; G A GLEESON
Journal:  Am J Syph Gonorrhea Vener Dis       Date:  1950-05

6.  Communications: The contribution of the Tuskegee study to medical knowledge.

Authors:  C J MacDonald
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  The Veteran's Hospital controversy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Hot Springs waters and the treatment of venereal diseases: the U.S. Public Health Service Clinic and Camp Garraday.

Authors:  E Walls
Journal:  J Ark Med Soc       Date:  1995-02

9.  The Public Health Service VD clinic in Hot Springs, AR.

Authors:  E Walls
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  "Misrepresentations of the Tuskegee Study"--distortion of anallysis and facts?

Authors:  Susan M Reverby
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Misrepresentations of the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis.

Authors:  Robert M White
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Awareness and knowledge of the U.S. Public Health Service syphilis study at Tuskegee: implications for biomedical research.

Authors:  Jan M McCallum; Dhananjaya M Arekere; B Lee Green; Ralph V Katz; Brian M Rivers
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2006-11

4.  Recruitment of a racially and ethnically diverse sample into a physical activity efficacy trial.

Authors:  Georita M Frierson; David M Williams; Shira Dunsiger; Beth A Lewis; Jessica A Whiteley; Anna E Albrecht; John M Jakicic; Santina M Horowitz; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.