Literature DB >> 15868456

A national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States.

Phyllis A Wingo1, Holly L Howe, Michael J Thun, Rachel Ballard-Barbash, Elizabeth Ward, Martin L Brown, JoAnne Sylvester, Gilbert H Friedell, Linda Alley, Julia H Rowland, Brenda K Edwards.   

Abstract

Enhancements to cancer surveillance systems are needed for meeting increased demands for data and for developing effective program planning, evaluation, and research on cancer prevention and control. Representatives from the American Cancer Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Cancer Registrars Association, and North American Association of Central Cancer Registries have worked together on the National Coordinating Council for Cancer Surveillance to develop a national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States. The framework addresses a continuum of disease progression from a healthy state to the end of life and includes primary prevention (factors that increase or decrease cancer occurrence in healthy populations), secondary prevention (screening and diagnosis), and tertiary prevention (factors that affect treatment, survival, quality of life, and palliative care). The framework also addresses cross-cutting information needs, including better data to monitor disparities by measures of socioeconomic status, to assess economic costs and benefits of specific interventions for individuals and for society, and to study the relationship between disease and individual biologic factors, social policies, and the environment. Implementation of the framework will require long-term, extensive coordination and cooperation among these major cancer surveillance organizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868456     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-3487-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  31 in total

1.  The Italian response to cancer survivorship research and practice: developing an evidence base for reform.

Authors:  Vittorio Mattioli; Rosanna Montanaro; Francesca Romito
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Linking the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System with Medicare, Medicaid, and Clinical Data from Home Health Care and Long Term Care Assessment Instruments: Paving the Way for New Research Endeavors in Geriatric Oncology.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2008

3.  The history and use of cancer registry data by public health cancer control programs in the United States.

Authors:  Mary C White; Frances Babcock; Nikki S Hayes; Angela B Mariotto; Faye L Wong; Betsy A Kohler; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Frequency and distribution of primary site among gender minority cancer patients: An analysis of U.S. national surveillance data.

Authors:  Rebecca Nash; Kevin C Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; David E Sandberg; Vin Tangpricha; Michael Goodman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Lung Cancer Among Women in the United States.

Authors:  S Jane Henley; Shayne Gallaway; Simple D Singh; Mary Elizabeth O'Neil; Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Behnoosh Momin; Thomas B Richards
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Sara L McLafferty; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Linking Medicare, Medicaid, and cancer registry data to study the burden of cancers in West Virginia.

Authors:  Pramit A Nadpara; Suresh S Madhavan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2012-11-05

Review 8.  Cancer survivorship and aging : moving the science forward.

Authors:  Keith M Bellizzi; Karen M Mustian; Oxana G Palesh; Michael Diefenbach
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Assessment of "best practice" treatment patterns for a "radiation oncology community outreach group" engaged in cancer disparities outcomes.

Authors:  Regiane S de Andrade; Julian W Proctor; Susan M Rakfal; E Day Werts; Larry L Schenken; Cheng B Saw; Michael Dougherty; David Stefanik
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  A new method to evaluate the completeness of case ascertainment by a cancer registry.

Authors:  Barnali Das; Limin X Clegg; Eric J Feuer; Linda W Pickle
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.