Literature DB >> 15868204

Alternative splicing removes an Ets interaction domain from Lozenge during Drosophila eye development.

Kristina Jackson Behan1, Jason Fair, Shalini Singh, Michael Bogwitz, Trent Perry, Vladimir Grubor, Fiona Cunningham, Charles D Nichols, Tara L Cheung, Philip Batterham, John Archie Pollock.   

Abstract

Physical and functional characteristics of the RUNX family of transcription factors are conserved between vertebrates and the Drosophila protein Lozenge. The runt-homology domain responsible for DNA binding and also the C-terminus are both nearly identical between the two proteins. The mammalian and fly proteins heterodimerize with a non-DNA binding partner protein to form a core binding factor essential for gene regulation during cell differentiation. The mammalian protein RUNX1 (AML1/PEBP2alphaB) interacts with the transcription factor Ets-1 to increase DNA binding and transactivation potential. Alternative splicing of the mammalian RUNX1 removes a domain required for this cooperative transactivation. In this work we determine the structure of the lozenge transcription unit and map 21 mutations. We show that the lozenge transcript is alternatively spliced during eye development to remove an Ets interaction domain. Emphasis is placed on Pointed the Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate Ets-1 protein; both Lozenge and Pointed proteins are needed for the activation of prospero expression. We use site-directed mutagenesis and yeast two-hybrid analysis to show that conserved amino acids within the alternate Lozenge exon are important for interaction with Pointed. Furthermore, the ectopic expression of Lozenge is sufficient to rescue Prospero expression in the presence of the Pointed competitor, Yan(ACT). We show that both lozenge isoforms are expressed during eye development and that the relative ratio of the transcripts for the two isoforms is sensitive to changes in Ras activity. We suggest that during eye development, Lozenge isoforms function in divergent roles, either interacting with Pointed on downstream targets or by functioning independently to establish distinct cell fates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868204     DOI: 10.1007/s00427-005-0490-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  53 in total

1.  Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences.

Authors:  S M Mount; C Burks; G Hertz; G D Stormo; O White; C Fields
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Auto-inhibition and partner proteins, core-binding factor beta (CBFbeta) and Ets-1, modulate DNA binding by CBFalpha2 (AML1).

Authors:  T L Gu; T L Goetz; B J Graves; N A Speck
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Patterning of cells in the Drosophila eye by Lozenge, which shares homologous domains with AML1.

Authors:  A Daga; C A Karlovich; K Dumstrei; U Banerjee
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Expression of the human acute myeloid leukemia gene AML1 is regulated by two promoter regions.

Authors:  M C Ghozi; Y Bernstein; V Negreanu; D Levanon; Y Groner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular and cytogenetical characterization of the 10A1-2 band and adjoining region in the Drosophila melanogaster polytene X chromosome.

Authors:  T u Kozlova; V F Semeshin; I V Tretyakova; E B Kokoza; V Pirrotta; V E Grafodatskaya; E S Belyaeva; I F Zhimulev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Searching for and predicting the activity of sites for DNA binding proteins: compilation and analysis of the binding sites for Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF).

Authors:  J A Goodrich; M L Schwartz; W R McClure
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  S Fields; O Song
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Mutations in lozenge and D-Pax2 invoke ectopic patterned cell death in the developing Drosophila eye using distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicole A Siddall; Kristina Jackson Behan; Jennifer R Crew; Tara L Cheung; Jason A Fair; Philip Batterham; John Archie Pollock
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 0.900

9.  Regulation of cone cell formation by Canoe and Ras in the developing Drosophila eye.

Authors:  T Matsuo; K Takahashi; S Kondo; K Kaibuchi; D Yamamoto
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  The biology of the Ets1 proto-oncogene.

Authors:  Jürgen Dittmer
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  10 in total

1.  The consequences of regulation of desat1 expression for pheromone emission and detection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Benjamin Houot; François Bousquet; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The lens in focus: a comparison of lens development in Drosophila and vertebrates.

Authors:  Mark Charlton-Perkins; Nadean L Brown; Tiffany A Cook
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Rapid evolutionary rewiring of a structurally constrained eye enhancer.

Authors:  Christina I Swanson; David B Schwimmer; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Canal cristae growth and fiber extension to the outer hair cells of the mouse ear require Prox1 activity.

Authors:  Bernd Fritzsch; Miriam Dillard; Alfonso Lavado; Natasha L Harvey; Israt Jahan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Is Runx a linchpin for developmental signaling in metazoans?

Authors:  James A Coffman
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Notch cooperates with Lozenge/Runx to lock haemocytes into a differentiation programme.

Authors:  Ana Terriente-Felix; Jinghua Li; Stephanie Collins; Amy Mulligan; Ian Reekie; Fred Bernard; Alena Krejci; Sarah Bray
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 7.  Receptor tyrosine kinases in Drosophila development.

Authors:  Richelle Sopko; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Ttk69-dependent repression of lozenge prevents the ectopic development of R7 cells in the Drosophila larval eye disc.

Authors:  Nicole A Siddall; Gary R Hime; John A Pollock; Philip Batterham
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Alternative splicing of transcription factors' genes: beyond the increase of proteome diversity.

Authors:  David Talavera; Modesto Orozco; Xavier de la Cruz
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-07-12

10.  The Drosophila ETV5 Homologue Ets96B: Molecular Link between Obesity and Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Michael J Williams; Anica Klockars; Anders Eriksson; Sarah Voisin; Rohit Dnyansagar; Lyle Wiemerslage; Anna Kasagiannis; Mehwish Akram; Sania Kheder; Valerie Ambrosi; Emilie Hallqvist; Robert Fredriksson; Helgi B Schiöth
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.