Literature DB >> 15868101

Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage, TAP transport and MHC class I binding.

S Tenzer1, B Peters, S Bulik, O Schoor, C Lemmel, M M Schatz, P-M Kloetzel, H-G Rammensee, H Schild, H-G Holzhütter.   

Abstract

Epitopes presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules are selected by a multi-step process. Here we present the first computational prediction of this process based on in vitro experiments characterizing proteasomal cleavage, transport by the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) and MHC class I binding. Our novel prediction method for proteasomal cleavages outperforms existing methods when tested on in vitro cleavage data. The analysis of our predictions for a new dataset consisting of 390 endogenously processed MHC class I ligands from cells with known proteasome composition shows that the immunological advantage of switching from constitutive to immunoproteasomes is mainly to suppress the creation of peptides in the cytosol that TAP cannot transport. Furthermore, we show that proteasomes are unlikely to generate MHC class I ligands with a C-terminal lysine residue, suggesting processing of these ligands by a different protease that may be tripeptidyl-peptidase II (TPPII).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868101     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-005-4528-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  15 in total

1.  Extracorporeal life support in cardiovascular patients with observed refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with favourable short and long-term outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Blumenstein; Jürgen Leick; Christoph Liebetrau; Joerg Kempfert; Luise Gaede; Sebastian Groß; Marcel Krug; Alexander Berkowitsch; Holger Nef; Andreas Rolf; Matthias Arlt; Thomas Walther; Christian W Hamm; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2016-09-20

2.  2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention.

Authors:  Charanjit S Rihal; Srihari S Naidu; Michael M Givertz; Wilson Y Szeto; James A Burke; Navin K Kapur; Morton Kern; Kirk N Garratt; James A Goldstein; Vivian Dimas; Thomas Tu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Intraaortic balloon support for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Karl Werdan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Outcomes with invasive vs conservative management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Navdeep Gupta; Yu Guo; Anuradha Lala; Leora Balsam; Robert O Roswell; Alex Reyentovich; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Potential Candidates for a Structured Canadian ECPR Program for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Brian Grunau; Frank Xavier Scheuermeyer; Dion Stub; Robert H Boone; Joseph Finkler; Sarah Pennington; Sarah Ann Carriere; Anson Cheung; Ruth MacRedmond; Jamil Bashir; Jim Christenson
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 7.  Hemodynamics of Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Daniel Burkhoff; Gabriel Sayer; Darshan Doshi; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Mechanical Pre-Conditioning With Acute Circulatory Support Before Reperfusion Limits Infarct Size in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Navin K Kapur; Xiaoying Qiao; Vikram Paruchuri; Kevin J Morine; Wajih Syed; Sam Dow; Nimish Shah; Natesa Pandian; Richard H Karas
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 12.035

9.  The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry.

Authors:  William W O'Neill; Theodore Schreiber; David H W Wohns; Charanjit Rihal; Srihari S Naidu; Andrew B Civitello; Simon R Dixon; Joseph M Massaro; Brijeshwar Maini; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults.

Authors:  L Christian Napp; Christian Kühn; Marius M Hoeper; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Axel Haverich; Andreas Schäfer; Johann Bauersachs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.460

View more
  139 in total

Review 1.  Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation.

Authors:  Jacques Neefjes; Marlieke L M Jongsma; Petra Paul; Oddmund Bakke
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 2.  MHC class II epitope predictive algorithms.

Authors:  Morten Nielsen; Ole Lund; Søren Buus; Claus Lundegaard
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 3.  Major histocompatibility complex class I binding predictions as a tool in epitope discovery.

Authors:  Claus Lundegaard; Ole Lund; Søren Buus; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Drug hypersensitivity caused by alteration of the MHC-presented self-peptide repertoire.

Authors:  David A Ostrov; Barry J Grant; Yuri A Pompeu; John Sidney; Mikkel Harndahl; Scott Southwood; Carla Oseroff; Shun Lu; Jean Jakoncic; Cesar Augusto F de Oliveira; Lun Yang; Hu Mei; Leming Shi; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; A Michelle English; Amanda Wriston; Andrew Lucas; Elizabeth Phillips; Simon Mallal; Howard M Grey; Alessandro Sette; Donald F Hunt; Soren Buus; Bjoern Peters
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  MHC-BPS: MHC-binder prediction server for identifying peptides of flexible lengths from sequence-derived physicochemical properties.

Authors:  Juan Cui; Lian Yi Han; Hong Huang Lin; Zhi Qun Tang; Li Jiang; Zhi Wei Cao; Yu Zong Chen
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.846

6.  A modular concept of HLA for comprehensive peptide binding prediction.

Authors:  David S DeLuca; Barbara Khattab; Rainer Blasczyk
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.846

7.  The Activation State of CD4 T Cells Alters Cellular Peptidase Activities, HIV Antigen Processing, and MHC Class I Presentation in a Sequence-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Julie Boucau; Julien Madouasse; Georgio Kourjian; Christopher S Carlin; Daniel Wambua; Matthew J Berberich; Sylvie Le Gall
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Robust quantitative modeling of peptide binding affinities for MHC molecules using physical-chemical descriptors.

Authors:  Ovidiu Ivanciuc; Werner Braun
Journal:  Protein Pept Lett       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.890

9.  The contributions of mass spectrometry to understanding of immune recognition by T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Victor H Engelhard
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Computational prediction of cleavage using proteasomal in vitro digestion and MHC I ligand data.

Authors:  Yu-feng Lu; Hao Sheng; Yi Zhang; Zhi-yang Li
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.066

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.