| Literature DB >> 15866757 |
Abstract
We modeled the flow of methyl mercury, a toxic global pollutant, in the Faroe Islands marine ecosystem and compared average human methyl mercury exposure from consumption of pilot whale meat and fish (cod, Gadus morhua) with current tolerable weekly intake (TWI) levels. Under present conditions and climate change scenarios, methyl mercury increased in the ecosystem, translating into increased human exposure over time. However, we saw greater changes as a result of changing fishing mortalities. A large portion of the general human population exceed the TWI levels set by the World Health Organization [WHO; 1.6 microg/kg body weight (bw)], and they all exceed the reference dose (RfD) of 0.1 microg/kg bw/day set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA; equivalent to a TWI of 0.7 microg/kg bw). As a result of an independent study documenting that Faroese children exposed prenatally to methyl mercury had reduced cognitive abilities, pregnant women have decreased their intake of whale meat and were below the TWI levels set by the WHO and the U.S. EPA. Cod had approximately 95% lower methyl mercury concentrations than did pilot whale. Thus, the high and harmful levels of methyl mercury in the diet of Faroe Islanders are driven by whale meat consumption, and the increasing impact of climate change is likely to exacerbate this situation. Significantly, base inflow rates of mercury into the environment would need to be reduced by approximately 50% to ensure levels of intake below the WHO TWI levels, given current levels of whale consumption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15866757 PMCID: PMC1257541 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Input parameters used as starting values (t0) in the Faroe Islands Ecotracer baseline simulation (t0 to t100).
| Group/species | Base inflow rate (g/km2/year) | Concentration (g/ | Ecopath input (g/km2) | Direct uptake rate (g/year) | Demethylation rate (per year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environment | 0.113 | NA | 3.3120 | NA | NA |
| Other toothed cetaceans | NA | 2.1150 | 0.0529 | NA | 0.20 |
| Pilot whales | NA | 1.4342 | 0.0737 | NA | 0.10 |
| Seals | NA | 1.4952 | 0.0105 | NA | 0.25 |
| Baleen whales | NA | 0.1058 | 0.0062 | NA | 0.20 |
| Seabirds | NA | 1.8985 | 0.0209 | NA | NA |
| Cod | NA | 0.0500 | 0.0285 | NA | NA |
| Haddock | NA | 0.0478 | 0.0345 | NA | NA |
| Saithe | NA | 0.0713 | 0.0435 | NA | NA |
| Redfish | NA | 0.0576 | 0.0613 | NA | NA |
| Greenland halibut | NA | 0.0771 | 0.0082 | NA | NA |
| Other demersal fish | NA | 0.0937 | 0.1170 | NA | NA |
| Other deepwater fish | NA | 0.2059 | 0.1811 | NA | NA |
| Herring | NA | 0.0246 | 0.0581 | NA | NA |
| Blue whiting | NA | 0.0258 | 0.0883 | NA | NA |
| Mackerel | NA | 0.0257 | 0.0138 | NA | NA |
| Other pelagic fish | NA | 0.0100 | 0.0765 | NA | NA |
| Benthos | NA | 0.0145 | 0.0281 | 0.0093 | NA |
| Squid | NA | 0.0173 | 0.1043 | NA | NA |
| Large zooplankton | NA | 0.0023 | 0.0377 | 0.0030 | NA |
| Small zooplankton | NA | 0.0009 | 0.0109 | 0.0030 | NA |
| Phytoplankton | NA | 0.0002 | 0.0105 | 0.0030 | NA |
| Detritus | NA | 0.0005 | NA | NA | NA |
NA, not applicable. Values were derived from the initial prebaseline simulation of the modeling routine replicating the effects of industrialization on methyl mercury concentrations in biota groups.
Predicted concentrations of methyl mercury (g/metric ton) in functional groups after the 100-year simulation (t0 – t100) compared with field measurements taken from the literature.
| Literature
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group name | Range | Mean | Model results | Literature mean vs. model results (% difference) |
| Other toothed cetaceans | 0.461–3.026 | 1.032 | 2.3596 | 128.6 |
| Pilot whale | 1.410–1.920 | 1.607 | 1.6000 | −0.4 |
| Seals | 1.722 | — | 1.6684 | −3.1 |
| Baleen whales | 0.095–0.136 | 0.115 | 0.1181 | 3.2 |
| Seabirds | 1.000–4.100 | 1.993 | 2.1184 | 6.3 |
| Cod | 0.003–0.104 | 0.055 | 0.0558 | 1.5 |
| Haddock | 0.008–0.096 | 0.052 | 0.0533 | 2.5 |
| Saithe | 0.050–0.080 | 0.065 | 0.0795 | 22.3 |
| Redfish | 0.024–0.148 | 0.072 | 0.0643 | −10.7 |
| Greenland halibut | 0.008–0.105 | 0.042 | 0.0860 | 104.8 |
| Other demersal fish | 0.002–0.312 | 0.095 | 0.1046 | 10.1 |
| Other deepwater fish | 0.056–0.336 | 0.139 | 0.2298 | 71.8 |
| Herring | 0.056–0.061 | 0.058 | 0.0274 | −52.8 |
| Blue whiting | — | — | 0.0288 | NA |
| Mackerel | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.0287 | 19.6 |
| Other pelagic fish | 0.004–0.047 | 0.015 | 0.0111 | −26.0 |
| Benthos | 0.008–0.136 | 0.065 | 0.0161 | −75.2 |
| Squid | 0.008–0.024 | 0.016 | 0.0193 | 20.6 |
| Large zooplankton | 0.001–0.012 | 0.005 | 0.0026 | −47.7 |
| Small zooplankton | — | — | 0.0010 | NA |
| Phytoplankton | — | — | 0.0002 | NA |
| Detritus | — | — | 0.0005 | NA |
| Environment | 3.612 | 3.612 | 3.6078 | −0.4 |
Abbreviations: —, not reported in literature; NA, not applicable.
Das et al. 2003; Holsbeek et al. 1999; Joiris et al. 1991; Siebert et al. 1999.
Caurant et al. 1996; Dam and Bloch 2000.
Das et al. 2003.
Dietz et al. 1996; Hansen et al. 1990.
Joiris et al. 1997c.
Joiris et al. 1997a; Mormede and Davies 2001; Rowe et al. 1998; Zauke et al. 1999.
Joiris et al. 1995; Rowe et al. 1998; Zauke et al. 1999.
Julshamn and Grahl-Nielsen 1996; Zauke et al. 1999.
Zauke et al. 1999.
Joiris et al. 1997a; Zauke et al. 1999.
Dixon and Jones 1994; Joiris et al. 1997a; Mormede and Davies 1998, 2001; Nixon et al. 1994; Rowe et al. 1998; Zauke et al. 1999.
Cronin et al. 1998; Mormede and Davies 2001; Rowe et al. 1998.
Dixon and Jones 1994; Rowe et al. 1998.
Rowe et al. 1998.
Joiris et al. 1995; Roméo et al. 1999.
Canli and Furness 1995; Dietz et al. 1996; Joiris et al. 1997a; Nixon et al. 1994; Rowe et al. 1998.
Frodello et al. 2000.
Joiris et al. 1997b; Ritterhoff and Zauke 1997.
Mason R, personal communication.
Figure 1(A–C) Simulated decreases of 20% in fishing mortality F: time series of selected taxa showing the proportional increases (A) and the proportional decreases (B) in biomass of main species/functional groups, and the proportional changes in monomethyl mercury (CH3Hg+) concentrations in selected taxa (C). (D–F) Simulated increases of 20% in F: proportional decreases (D) and increases (E) in biomass for the main taxa, and the proportional changes in methyl mercury concentrations in selected taxa (F ). Status quo (no change in fishing mortality rates) represents the same taxa, but the groups do not differentiate graphically.
Figure 2Effects of climate change and changing fishing mortality (F) on the methyl mercury concentrations in pilot whales (Globicephala melas; A) and cod (Gadus morhua; B). Note the significant difference in scale of the y-axis. Other species showed similar general trends. Increasing F decreased the load relative to the status quo scenario, whereas decreasing F had the opposite effect.
Figure 3Results of the dietary analysis for the general population and pregnant women compared with the TWI limits set by the WHO (1.6 μg/kg bw) and the U.S. EPA equivalent (RfD of 0.1 μg/kg bw/day expressed as a TWI of 0.7 μg/kg bw). Under all simulations, a substantial portion of the general adult population had dietary intakes greater than the WHO limit, and all members’ consumption was greater than the limit set by the U.S. EPA. The TWI level under a simulated 50% reduction in the base inflow rate (BIR) of mercury into the environment is also shown. Pregnant women were well below the limits set by the WHO and the U.S. EPA under all scenarios. Note that the present-day scenarios for both groups at t100 are not presented because they were only marginally different than the status quo at t200.