Literature DB >> 15866006

Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals.

R Coello1, A Charlett, J Wilson, V Ward, A Pearson, P Borriello.   

Abstract

Between October 1997 and June 2001, 140 English hospitals participating in the surveillance of surgical site infection (SSI) with the Nosocomial Infection National Surveillance Service (NINSS) reported 2832 SSIs following 67 410 surgical procedures in nine defined categories of surgery. Limb amputation had the highest incidence of SSI with 14.3 SSIs per 100 operations. For all categories of surgery, except knee prosthesis (P=0.128), there was a linear increase in the incidence of SSI when the American National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index increased. Superficial incisional SSI was more common than deep incisional and organ/space SSI, and accounted for more than half of all SSIs for all categories of surgery. The postoperative length of stay (LOS) was longer for patients with SSI, and when adjusted for other factors influencing LOS, the extra LOS due to SSI ranged from 3.3 days for abdominal hysterectomy to 21.0 days for limb amputation, and was at least nine days for the other categories. The additional cost attributable to SSI ranged from pound959 for abdominal hysterectomy to pound6103 for limb amputation. Deep incisional and organ/space SSI combined incurred a greater extra LOS and cost than superficial incisional SSI for all categories of surgery, except limb amputation. The crude mortality rate was higher for patients with SSI for all categories of surgery but, after controlling for confounding, only patients with SSI following hip prosthesis had a mortality rate that was significantly higher than those without SSI [odds ratio (OR)=1.8, P=0.002]. However, the adjusted mortality rate for patients with deep incisional and organ/space SSI compared with those without SSI was significantly higher for vascular surgery (OR=6.8, P<0.001), hip prosthesis (OR=2.5, P=0.005) and large bowel surgery (OR=1.8, P=0.04). This study shows that the adverse impact of SSI differs greatly for different categories of surgery, and highlights the importance of measuring the impact for defined categories rather than for all SSIs and all surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15866006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  91 in total

1.  Impact of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery on hospital stay and medical expenditure in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuichi Kashimura; Shinya Kusachi; Toshiro Konishi; Junzo Shimizu; Masato Kusunoki; Masaaki Oka; Toshiro Wakatsuki; Yoshinobu Sumiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Variable impact of complications in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eelke Bosma; Eelco J Veen; Mariska A C de Jongh; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Measures to prevent surgical site infections: what surgeons (should) do.

Authors:  Michele Diana; Martin Hübner; Marie-Christine Eisenring; Giorgio Zanetti; Nicolas Troillet; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods.

Authors:  Ebere Akobundu; Jing Ju; Lisa Blatt; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Surgical site infections: epidemiology and microbiological aspects in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Rose A Cooper
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Ross A Atkinson; Tanya A Smith; Ceri Rowlands; Amber D Rithalia; Emma J Crosbie; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-30

7.  Does chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine preoperative antisepsis reduce surgical site infection in cranial neurosurgery?

Authors:  B M Davies; H C Patel
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  [Prophylactic antibiotherapy in hip arthroplasty. Cohort study].

Authors:  M Garrote-Garrote; J A Del-Moral-Luque; A Checa-García; J F Valverde-Cánovas; C Campelo-Gutiérrez; J Martínez-Martín; A Gil-de-Miguel; G Rodríguez-Caravaca
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  A novel, validated risk score to predict surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Katherine E Poruk; Joseph A Lin; Michol A Cooper; Jin He; Martin A Makary; Kenzo Hirose; John L Cameron; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Frederic Eckhauser; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Bacterial contamination of hospital bed-control handsets in a surgical setting: a potential marker of contamination of the healthcare environment.

Authors:  R R W Brady; P Kalima; N N Damani; R G Wilson; M G Dunlop
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.